In this 2007 study, 12 young, healthy, insulin-resistant men (1) were compared to 12 insulin-sensitive but otherwise similar men. Inflammation levels, weight, fat mass, and activity levels were similar between groups. The insulin-resistant subjects had lower baseline HDL, higher uric acid levels, and higher fasting plasma glucose, insulin, and triglyceride levels.
Both groups were given a high-carbohydrate meal (2). The subjects in both groups showed similar postprandial increases in blood glucose levels, while triglyceride and insulin levels increased more in insulin-resistant subjects than in their insulin-sensitive counterparts. Using labeled carbohydrates, researchers were able to track the fate of the ingested carbs. In the insulin-resistant subjects, muscle glycogen synthesis was 61% lower than in insulin-sensitive subjects; hepatic triglyceride synthesis and hepatic DNL were 2.5 and 2.2 times higher, respectively. In other words, a larger share of the ingested carbohydrates were shuttled toward triglyceride production rather than being stored as glycogen in insulin-resistant subjects.
Increased triglyceride production in insulin-resistant subjects accordingly led to higher levels of postprandial VLDL and lower levels of postprandial HDL than in insulin-sensitive subjects. This pattern is consistent with previous research indicating skeletal muscle insulin resistance leads to increased plasma triglycerides and reduced plasma HDL (3).
This study illustrates the primary role muscular insulin resistance can play in the development of metabolic disease. As shown here, muscular insulin resistance — observed prior to any defects in overall adiposity or inflammation — leads to a greater share of consumed calories being directed toward triglyceride production and a smaller share toward glycogen storage, even when identical meals are consumed. This increased triglyceride production would be expected to lead to fatty liver disease and hepatic insulin resistance (4), which itself leads to fasting hyperglycemia, obesity, and diabetes (5). The fact that these defects were visible in subjects with normal body weight and normal levels of inflammation suggests such factors are secondary defects and impaired muscular insulin sensitivity is the initial cause of the metabolic syndrome in at least some individuals (6). This suggests interventions to maintain and improve the ability of muscle cells to take up glucose in response to insulin — including, as previously reviewed on CrossFit.com, exercise — may play a particularly important role in the prevention and/or amelioration of the metabolic syndrome.
- This group specifically included men who exhibited muscular insulin resistance, meaning their muscle cells failed to take up glucose effectively in response to insulin.
- Subjects received a meal that contained one-third of their daily caloric requirement and included 55% of calories from carbohydrate, 10% from protein, and 35% from fat. Note this is similar to the dietary composition recommended by a variety of dietary guidelines and similar to the standard American diet.
- Redistribution of substrates to adipose tissue promotes obesity in mice with selective insulin resistance in muscle; Metabolic abnormalities: triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein
- The case of visceral fat: argument for the defense; Measurement of plasma glucose, free fatty acid, lactate and insulin for 24h in patients with NIDDM
- Mechanism of insulin resistance in A-ZIP/F-1 fatless mice; Tissue-specific overexpression of lipoprotein lipase causes tissue-specific insulin resistance; Leptin reverses insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis in patients with severe lipodystrophy; Mechanism of hepatic insulin resistance in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; Prevention of hepatic steatosis and hepatic insulin resistance in mitochondrial acyl-CoA:glycerol-sn-3-phosphate acyltransferase 1 knockout mice, etc.
- Inflammation, stress and diabetes; The humoral side of insulin resistance; Inflammation and insulin resistance; Adiposity, fat distribution and cardiovascular risk; Relationships of generalized and regional adiposity to insulin sensitivity in men; Intra-abdominal fat is a major determinant of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Criteria for the metabolic syndrome