Community
A well-run class drives cohesion and trust while delivering value to athletes. When the coach is ill prepared or unable to care for all athletes in the class, the glue that binds a community together becomes compromised.
As the CrossFit Journal explained in 2006, “The social dynamic of group classes is extremely powerful. Run correctly, they motivate an athletic output that is only rarely matched in one-on-one training.”
With everyone on the same page, the group learns to work together and shares in how they experience class, further enhancing the community.
HOW IS IT DONE?
Affiliates successfully apply class planning in a number of ways.
One Coach Writes All the Plans
In this model, one coach takes on the responsibility of writing the class plan for every class. This responsibility can be shared, meaning a different coach can be assigned the task for a week or a month at a time; however, one coach is responsible for producing a plan for every day for a set period of time.
A Different Coach Writes a Class Plan for Each Day of the Week
In this model, a different member of the coaching staff writes the class plan for one day of every week. For example, one coach is assigned to write the class plans for Mondays, a different coach for Tuesdays, and so on. Often, the coach who writes the class plan for the day is the early morning coach so any changes or tweaks that need to be made can be communicated to the other coaches on the team.
The Head Coach Gives Class Plan Guidelines
In this model, the head coach will provide general guidelines for how they want each day’s classes to unfold. These guidelines can include specifics such as intended stimulus, time domain, scaling options, and warm-up movements. Within those guidelines, it is up to each coach to write their own class plan for the classes they teach that day.
The Affiliate Utilizes a Third-Party Programming and Class Planning Service
In this model, the affiliate outsources its programming to a third party. Each workout is delivered with a class plan that often includes a timeline, general warm-up, movement progressions, scaling options, and more.
Additional Considerations
As with any system or structure, there are benefits and drawbacks to each of the class planning protocols described above.
One Coach Writes All the Plans
When one coach is assigned to write all the class plans for a set period of time, they can build continuity around what they have written earlier that week. For example, a coach might work a kipping pull-up progression into the warm-ups over the course of an entire week. Additionally, since this duty can be assigned to one coach, the rest of the staff can be freed up to focus on other tasks.
The drawback is that this is a large heap of work for one individual to tackle on an ongoing basis. This method makes significant demands on a coach’s time and creativity. It also can prevent newer coaches from having exposure to and practice with writing their own class plans.
One Coach Writes a Class Plan for Each Day of the Week
The benefit to this model is that it gives every coach at the affiliate, from beginner to advanced coaches, a touchpoint for development. Each coach gets a chance to write at least one class plan per week. There is often space for individuality and unique contribution from each coach, and coaches can learn from seeing and executing one another’s work.
The drawback to this plan is that coaches will need to review what has been done the previous few days to avoid repetition of various warm-ups, progressions, or other class components.
