Thursday

190912

Workout of the Day

Deadlift 5-5-3-3-3-1-1-1-1 reps

Practice SLIPS for 20 minutes.

Post loads to comments. | Compare to 190216.

Comments on 190912

80 Comments

Comment thread URL copied!
Shawn Hakimi
February 22nd, 2023 at 3:31 pm
Commented on: 190912

275-295-315-325-335-355-360-360-360 Rx'd


SLIPS completed.

Comment URL copied!
Doug Brubacher
September 6th, 2021 at 11:33 pm
Commented on: 190912

CFWUx2 10x20kg 10x60kg

185 223 234 239.5 245 256 267 278 278

Comment URL copied!
Kury Akin
December 12th, 2019 at 2:15 pm
Commented on: 190912
75.95. 115.125.135. 140.145.150.150kg Recovering from back injury Prev. 115.125. 135.135.140. 150.155.160.165kg
Comment URL copied!
Kury Akin
December 12th, 2019 at 2:33 pm
SLIPS EMOM S@40 seconds each round, L@20, I@30, P@30, S@40
Comment URL copied!
Cy Azizi
October 5th, 2019 at 6:39 pm
Commented on: 190912
225,275,285,295,295,315,320,325(F),325(F)
Comment URL copied!
Jeff Chalfant
October 4th, 2019 at 3:15 am
Commented on: 190912
405-405-415-415-415-425-425-dnf (too smoked) but did SLiPS after. 2x:20 scale each way, played with L sit to handstand press. lowers from mid press to L and press to midway from L. Also some -:20-:30 second pseudo planche planks.
Comment URL copied!
Adam King
September 18th, 2019 at 5:59 pm
Commented on: 190912
Completed 2019-09-18 135-155-215-215-235-255-275-295(f)
Comment URL copied!
Scott Wiedmeyer
September 18th, 2019 at 3:32 am
Commented on: 190912
33 / M / 5'9" / 137lbs Late post from Saturday. Didn't have anything heavy, so I decided to do 10x reps with what I had. Then my cousin asked me to come to her spin class the next morning, so I cut this short so as not to die on the bike... Dumbbells deadlifts 50-50-30-30 25F-15-15-20
Comment URL copied!
Scott Wiedmeyer
September 18th, 2019 at 3:33 am
SLIPS completed
Comment URL copied!
Ruthie Lloyd
September 17th, 2019 at 4:48 pm
Commented on: 190912
F/49/5'6"/145 X5: 105#, 125# X3: 135#, 145#, 155# X1: all 155#
Comment URL copied!
Jeremy Ho
September 17th, 2019 at 2:59 pm
Commented on: 190912
Warmup: 2 sets of 135/12 rep 2 sets 185/10 reps 2 sets 225/8 reps 2 sets 275/5 reps and 3 reps
Comment URL copied!
Mark Lawrence
September 17th, 2019 at 3:01 am
Commented on: 190912
5's @ 275 3's @ 315 1 @ 365 1 @ 355 1 @ 345 x 3
Comment URL copied!
Jeffrey Howard
September 16th, 2019 at 6:35 pm
Commented on: 190912
255-265-275-285-295-305-315-325(miss)-315#
Comment URL copied!
Daniel Orozco
September 15th, 2019 at 11:50 pm
Commented on: 190912
Posting a bit late, but... 90kg, 95kg, 105kg, 110kg, 115kg, 120kg, 120kg, 125kg, 125kg. Bodyweight: 65kg
Comment URL copied!
R Albers
September 14th, 2019 at 11:28 pm
Commented on: 190912
5- 185, 190# 3- 195, 200, 205 1- 210 (í—4 all my weight set)😯... time for me to go shopping too.
Comment URL copied!
Troy Bruun
September 14th, 2019 at 7:34 pm
Commented on: 190912
Did on 9/12 275-275-295-315-315-325-330-345-345
Comment URL copied!
Donald Anthony
September 14th, 2019 at 5:53 pm
Commented on: 190912
315 for 2 sets 5 reps 365 for 3 sets 3 reps 400 for 4 sets 1 rep
Comment URL copied!
Katina Thornton
September 14th, 2019 at 1:43 pm
Commented on: Fructose Induces Transketolase Flux to Promote Pancreatic Cancer Growth
The fiber found in the naturally occurring fructose sources slows the fructose absorption such that, gram for gram, the physiologic response is somewhat different when eating highly processed foods containg fructose and naturally occurring foods containing fructose. Russ Greene made an important point, though, about the manipulation of fruit and the omnipresent plump, sweet, juicy berries that minimally resemble their wild cousins found in nature. It is for this reason, that I think "some fruit" in our CrossFit prescription is so salient. Eliminating the highly processed foods, including beverages, should be obvious. It is important to note, when we are considering what we are going to eat, that pancreatic cancer is on the rise. There is expected to be a 2% increase in pancreatic cancer daignoses from 2018 to 2019. Once again, we cannot control our genetics, so we must control our environment to the extent that we can.
Comment URL copied!
Katina Thornton
September 14th, 2019 at 1:26 pm
Commented on: Muscle Basics, Part 3
It would seem to be important to have an optimal balance of myofibrillar and sarcoplasmic components for GPP. Since we don't really know what that balance is, we should not bias our training. This really brings us, as CrossFitters, full circle back to Coach Glassman's idea of constantly varied functional movements across broad time and modal domains. This ostensibly fosters growth in both domains in the appropiate ratio, and as we can and do measure, allows for unrivaled GPP.
Comment URL copied!
Jim Rix
September 14th, 2019 at 5:28 am
Commented on: 190912
5-5-5-5-5 deadlift 265-265-270-270-270#
Comment URL copied!
Joseph Amaya
September 14th, 2019 at 1:36 am
Commented on: 190912
5. 200 6. 205 7. 215 8. 220 9. 225 10. 235 11. 240 12. 250 failed 13. 245 failed
Comment URL copied!
Tripp Starling
September 13th, 2019 at 11:17 pm
Commented on: 190912
215/5 235/5 255/3 265/3 275/3 285/1 285/f SLIPS 20 minutes Cool down was cleaning the gym😉
Comment URL copied!
Logan Gerhard
September 13th, 2019 at 8:57 pm
Commented on: 190912
M/38/5’8/152 5’s = 195 3’s = 225 1’s = 235, 245, 255, 255, 265 (PR) no grips no belt
Comment URL copied!
Chase Hiland
September 13th, 2019 at 7:54 pm
Commented on: 190912
M/34/5’10”/190 275-295-315-325-335-345-355-365-375 Was still hurting from the DB thrusters. Not a PR day, but good lifts.
Comment URL copied!
Lucas Allan
September 13th, 2019 at 6:09 pm
Commented on: 190912
M/43 DL 531 215(5)-255(5)-280(10) 10 min emom 3 shspu scales and l sit hold from bar (2x25 secs)
Comment URL copied!
John Clarke
September 13th, 2019 at 5:55 pm
Commented on: 190912
135-185-225-245-255-275-285-295 (f)-295(f)
Comment URL copied!
Nathaniel Robichaud
September 13th, 2019 at 4:23 pm
Commented on: 190912
185-225 275-295-315(f) 335-345-365(f)-345
Comment URL copied!
Daniel Shepard
September 13th, 2019 at 1:53 pm
Commented on: 190912
FS 3@210 BS 20@185 Nancy 13:40 75lb ohs (go heavier on ohs) Tabata ring supports
Comment URL copied!
Matt Zero
September 13th, 2019 at 12:09 pm
Commented on: 190912
225/245/265/275/295/315/335/355f/335
Comment URL copied!
Claire Fiddian-Green
September 13th, 2019 at 11:52 am
Commented on: 190912
Deadlifts: 5@175 lb., 195, 215, 220. 3@225, 235, 235. 1@175, 195, 215, 235, 245 (F). Interspersed the 1’s with front/back scales, L sits, HS holds. Not sure why I couldn’t get 245; my 1RM is 265.
Comment URL copied!
Antonio Larco
September 13th, 2019 at 11:32 am
Commented on: 190912
500
Comment URL copied!
Ethan Money
September 13th, 2019 at 10:50 am
Commented on: 190912
135-225-235-245-255-265-275-285-290
Comment URL copied!
Mike Gutto
September 13th, 2019 at 9:41 am
Commented on: 190912
5@83 5@93 3@123 3@153 1@173 1@193 1@243
Comment URL copied!
Thomas Eichholzer
September 13th, 2019 at 5:30 am
Commented on: Fructose Induces Transketolase Flux to Promote Pancreatic Cancer Growth
Thank you very much, sirs! This is the context i wished for.
Comment URL copied!
Roux Nelson
September 13th, 2019 at 1:43 am
Commented on: 190912
5x 295-315 3x365-395-405 1x425-455-460(PR!)
Comment URL copied!
Js Smith
September 13th, 2019 at 1:24 am
Commented on: 190912
5:65/85 3:105/125/145 1:155/165(f)/165 Body said it’s done there. Someday I’m gonna break 165. 🙄
Comment URL copied!
Js Smith
September 13th, 2019 at 2:49 am
15 min of stretching
Comment URL copied!
Michael Arko
September 13th, 2019 at 12:09 am
Commented on: 190912
I mixed the SLIPS element in between DL sets, 4 mins each. 5 @ 240 L sits 5 @ 240 3 @ 250 HS descents 3 @ 250 Scales 3 @ 250 1 @ 260 Planks 1 @ 260 1 @ 270 Stretch 1 @ 280
Comment URL copied!
Marlies Severyn
September 12th, 2019 at 11:56 pm
Commented on: 190912
Not my best result today but the last set of 3 was good. 5@165, 175 3@ 185, 195, 205 1@ 215, 225(f), 225(f), 220(f)
Comment URL copied!
Laura Echeverri
September 12th, 2019 at 11:50 pm
Commented on: 190912
5. 80 lb 5. 85 lb 3. 95 lb 3. 100 lb 3. 110 lb 1. 120 lb 1. 125 lb 1. 130 lb 1. 135 lb
Comment URL copied!
Elizabeth Cheek
September 13th, 2019 at 2:01 am
Great job all!
Comment URL copied!
Shane Azizi
September 12th, 2019 at 9:34 pm
Commented on: 190912
225, 275, 315, 315, 315, 365, 370 (f), 370 (f), 365 (f) Rx
Comment URL copied!
John Keenan
September 12th, 2019 at 8:19 pm
Commented on: 190912
49/m/6/215# Warmup Sets of five 120-180-205-225 255(5)-260(5)-265(3)-270(3)275(3)-280(1)-285(1)-285(1)-285 fail. Ran out of time for anything else including reattack at last 285. As soon as I headed to the house from the barn, I felt strong enough to do it, but I had to get kid to the bus.
Comment URL copied!
John Keenan
September 12th, 2019 at 8:27 pm
I might also mention that the 5# increments on main lifts were due to weight availability. I’m near my max available weight at 225# on iron bar set so I supplement with my weight vest and go from 30# to 60# with that on
Comment URL copied!
Nicole Deaver
September 12th, 2019 at 7:59 pm
Commented on: 190912
Deadlifts 5 @ 135/155 3 @ 175/185/195 1 @ 200/210/220/230(PR) Everything felt heavy today!! Same PR...because I'm out of weight to add 😂 Scales & Planks btwn sets, the rest after.
Comment URL copied!
Jim Rix
September 13th, 2019 at 12:11 am
Time to go shopping, Nicole!
Comment URL copied!
Coastie Nick
September 12th, 2019 at 7:55 pm
Commented on: 190912
225-315-335-355-375-385-395-405-415
Comment URL copied!
Hank McKibban
September 12th, 2019 at 7:45 pm
Commented on: 190912
275-315-315-315-315-335-350-350-350 +SLIPS 190308: 275-315-335-365-370-380-385-365-325 190219: 315-335-355-365-365-380(f)-380(f)-315-315 180325: 275-295-315-325-330-335-355(f)-225-dnf
Comment URL copied!
Dmitry Zolotyh
September 12th, 2019 at 6:58 pm
Commented on: 190912
5x 80-85 kg 3x 90-95-100 kg 1x 105-110-112,5-115(F)-110 kg
Comment URL copied!
Jade Teasdale
September 12th, 2019 at 6:06 pm
Commented on: 190912
No belt or grips! No Bumpers! No Dropping! High Right Glutei was sore! Sore Ass! 😂 All Time DL PR: 265 (tested years ago...with grips) Warm Up Sets: 115 X3 135 X3 155 X3 5-5 (185-Scales-205) 3-3-3 Staggered Grip! (L-Sits-215-Inversions-225-Planks-225) 235X3 = FAIL! Got 1 rep... went back to 225 for the last 3! 1-1-1-1 (235-240-245-250) Should’ve stopped at 245! 250 didn’t feel as solid! STRETCHING! For more than 4 min. 🤪
Comment URL copied!
Sebastien Fitzpatrick
September 12th, 2019 at 4:32 pm
Commented on: 190912
365 - 405lbs 425 - 425 - 425lbs 455 - 455 - 475 - 500lbs(PR) Never thought in my life I’d ever see 500lbs in my lifts. Now to get better at the metcon workouts we’ve been repeating.
Comment URL copied!
Stacey Thompkins
September 12th, 2019 at 6:33 pm
Awesome!!!
Comment URL copied!
Hank McKibban
September 12th, 2019 at 7:48 pm
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Comment URL copied!
Nicole Deaver
September 12th, 2019 at 7:59 pm
Congratulations that’s awesome!
Comment URL copied!
Tripp Starling
September 12th, 2019 at 10:52 pm
CONGRATS!!
Comment URL copied!
Jim Rix
September 13th, 2019 at 12:09 am
Way to go!!
Comment URL copied!
Claire Fiddian-Green
September 13th, 2019 at 1:56 pm
Amazing!
Comment URL copied!
Jade Teasdale
September 14th, 2019 at 4:48 pm
😎👍🏽 Way to go!!! Don’t Quit! I’m still trying to break 300! 😂
Comment URL copied!
Brandon Berry
September 12th, 2019 at 4:01 pm
Commented on: 190912
5s 275 3s 315 335, 355, 375, 375, 400 failed All upper sets unbroken. 1-2 min. rest/rnd
Comment URL copied!
Michael Bishop
September 12th, 2019 at 2:45 pm
Commented on: 190912
focussed on form and do drops today - golf tourney in an hour so didn't try any 1RMs 2x5 @ 225 3x3 @ 315 do drops
Comment URL copied!
Greg Fairbanks
September 12th, 2019 at 2:18 pm
Commented on: 190912
155-185-195-205-215-235-245-245-255
Comment URL copied!
Claudio Delgado-Valcarcel
September 12th, 2019 at 1:21 pm
Commented on: 190912
5’7/42YOM/189lbs RAW DL’s no straps, wraps or belts w/ 3 minutes breaks between sets 5’s @274lbs 3’s @304lbs 1’s @344lbs definitely will need to buy wrist straps
Comment URL copied!
Russ Greene
September 12th, 2019 at 1:07 pm
Commented on: Muscle Basics, Part 3
This part requires further elucidation: "Higher-intensity training is most likely to result in myofibrillar hypertrophy, whereas architectural and contractile protein additions provide the lion’s share of increased muscle mass. Lower-intensity and exhaustive exercise will most likely result in sarcoplasmic hypertrophy, where the added mass results from increased intracellular energy stores, increased presence of metabolic chemicals, increased mitochondrial content, and augmentation of other metabolic elements." Intensity in exercise science can refer to several different things. I presume that "higher-intensity" here indicates intensity relative to an athlete's one rep max lift in strength training, and not higher intensity in the standard CrossFit sense of intensity relative to maximal power output in a particular context. CrossFit's benchmark workouts such as "Fran" and "Elizabeth" are low to medium intensity for experienced athletes in the one-rep max sense of intensity. That is, 95 pounds on thrusters and 135 pounds on cleans will tend to be relatively low percentages of the one-rep-max thrusters and cleans for this population. Nonetheless, "Fran" and "Elizabeth" are usually performed at a high intensity relative to the athletes' maximal power output for their particular time and modal domains. And this for obvious reasons: no one wants to post a slow time on the board, and everyone wants to PR. A third possible definition of intensity would be intensity relative to VO2Max, though you could argue that this is functionally equivalent to CrossFit's definition of intensity when applied to time domains of around 3-4 minutes, and longer. This confusion surrounding the definition intensity is important if we are to know what muscular adaptations we can expect from "Fran" and "Elizabeth," whether myofibrillar or sarcoplasmic. Though indeed, if it is all based upon "conjecture," as the author states, the distinction may in the end be moot. Lastly, I appreciate the author's frankness and epistemic humility here: "the precise mechanism behind muscle growth largely is not understood." In our current absence of well-supported theories and laws governing the physiological response to exercise, we should base training and programming off of documented physical, not notional physiological, responses. That is, we should measure (F*D)/T at a variety of time and modal domains prior to an intervention, perform the intervention, and then measure it again. Efficacy depends on reliably increasing (F*D)/T, not on conforming with a particular model of expected physiological adaptation (which is likely quite distinct from reality besides). As Greg has said, exercise science is not a mature enough field to derive conclusions from first principles and models.
Comment URL copied!
Rachel Vitale
September 12th, 2019 at 6:59 pm
not as eloquently written, but I had the same question as to what the definition of intensity is in terms of hypertrophy training.
Comment URL copied!
Tyler Hass
September 12th, 2019 at 10:33 pm
"Intensity" is one of those words, like "fitness", that used to be very poorly defined. People on all sides of the debate wanted to own it exclusively for their domain-specific use. Exercise science tends to define it as %1RM and powerlifters were happy to go along with this definition. For runners and other athletes, this definition is pretty useless, so they go by pace, HR or VO2max. For others, intensity seems to correlate to the amount of Mountain Dew consumed... I agree with you, that intensity should be defined as percentage of power output under given conditions. This definition is inclusive of powerlifting, CrossFit, marathon running, etc.
Comment URL copied!
Lon Kilgore
September 13th, 2019 at 7:58 pm
Astute as always Russ! I am specifically talking force of contraction required, i.e., in the weight room how much weight is on the bar. But I did not specify. The discussion of intensity as you note is deep, and beyond the intent of the primer presented ... although at some point on this journey I'd really like to take the time to simplify and unify the concepts across modes of exercise.
Comment URL copied!
Stacey Thompkins
September 12th, 2019 at 12:11 pm
Commented on: 190912
M/44/6'2"/180# Trap bar DL's 270/290 310/325/335 350/365/380/400
Comment URL copied!
Thomas Eichholzer
September 12th, 2019 at 10:41 am
Commented on: Fructose Induces Transketolase Flux to Promote Pancreatic Cancer Growth
In articles about fructose, can you please specify the definition of fructose? In a previous posted study from Fribourg, Switzerland there was mentioned a difference between natural fructose in fruits and clinical/pure fructose. According Wikipedia fructose is natural and high in relation to glucose in apples and pears. So how and on wich foods could this be interpeted? Maybe its just me, sorry.
Comment URL copied!
Mary Dan Eades
September 12th, 2019 at 3:29 pm
As far as the biochemical metabolism of fructose goes, there isn't any difference between refined fructose as found in table sugar or HFCS or pure fructose and the 'natural' fructose found in a pear or an apple. Fructose is fructose and it's handled the same way by the body's biochemical machinery. And it's handled more 'loosely' than glucose metabolically. But there is a huge difference in the absolute amount consumed in a pear or an apple and the amount consumed from sugar- or HFCS- sweetened beverages (the main culprit in the markedly increased consumption of fructose seen nationwide and globally) and from commercially-processed foods. There are about 12-15g of fructose in the average apple or pear. And about 20g in the average 12-ounce soda. That doesn't seem so different, but people generally will eat a pear or an apple, not four of them at a go. (Granted, there is the bizarre outlier of Steve Jobs, who apparently subsisted on some huge number of apples a day and not much else for weeks at a time. And perhaps it's worth noting in light of this study that pancreatic cancer was his fatal diagnosis, but that's just correlation in a 'n' of 1, not causation.) Whereas in sodas, a single 12-ounce can is the outlier. It's not unusual at all for people (including kids, sadly) to go for the supersized soda, containing 32 ounces (with over 50g fructose) or more, and go back for a refill... or two. Then add the fructose load from packaged foods routinely consumed by the soda drinking crowd (toaster pastries, sugar sweetened cereals, sugar sweetened yogurt, pancake syrup, ice cream, and the endless list from there) and you could be staring a daily 200 to 300g fructose intake in the face before you blink. As is so often the case with nutrition and disease, the deleterious effect of a food is a matter of degree. And fructose is likely no different. The culprit is more the perversion of the natural human diet from one of a wide variety of whole foods eaten ad lib to satiety (even those containing some fructose, which had evolutionary survival advantages of fattening us up for the winter) to one filled with Frankenfoods consisting chiefly of three components: concentrated, refined starch (wheat, corn, rice), sucrose and/or HFCS, and industrially processed 'vegetable' fats, processed into different forms, but basically all the same thing.
Comment URL copied!
Russ Greene
September 12th, 2019 at 4:23 pm
In addition to Dr. Eades' point on degree, which I agree with, I would also suggest that the context in which fructose appears differs in nature versus in industrial products ("processed food"). On the tree, fruit contains vitamin C, polyphenols, and fiber which affect how the fructose is metabolized and the health impact thereof. Drs. Robert Lustig and Barry Sears have both expounded on this point. So I would expect that even gram for gram, the fructose in an orange or grapefruit will not have the same effect as the fructose in soda pop. That being said, man has manipulated nature to grow fruit larger and sweeter, and to make it available year-round, such that true "Paleolithic" eating likely requires less fruit consumption than one might prefer. A banana of 2019 is not the banana of 1419, AD or BC.
Comment URL copied!
Luis Rindfleisch
September 12th, 2019 at 10:27 am
Commented on: 190912
185,195,205,215,225,235,245,265,275
Comment URL copied!
Jeremiah Tananen
September 12th, 2019 at 11:32 am
KG?
Comment URL copied!
Steven Thunander
September 12th, 2019 at 1:55 am
Commented on: 190912
Globo Scale: As is. If you need to, put pads under the plates and lower the bar slowly to reduce noise so as to not piss off the globo manager. If you're at Planet Fitness or somewhere with only a smith machine, do smith machine rack pulls, them the dumbbell work below. If on a cruise ship or without a barbell today, do single leg dumbbell deadlifts with the heaviest dumbbells, without form breaking down. Then do short treadmill pushes or fast sprints.
Comment URL copied!
Bryan Rosen
September 12th, 2019 at 1:07 am
Commented on: 190912
Warm-up for 190912: GENERAL WARM-UP AMRAP 10 In teams of two, alternate: Partner A) Run 100 meters Partner B) 10 scapular pull-ups + 5 inchworms with a push-up + 5 air squats SPECIFIC WARM-UP Deadlift Perform the following progression with an empty barbell: 10 tempo stiff-legged deadlifts (3-seconds down, 3-seconds up) 5 deadlifts from above the knee 5 deadlifts Build up 5 deadlifts at a light load (less than 50% of 1RM) 3 sets of 5 deadlifts increasing in load: Set 1 at approximately 60% of 1RM Set 2 at approximately 70% of 1RM Set 3 at approximately 75% of 1RM
Comment URL copied!
J D
September 14th, 2019 at 1:02 am
Thanks to Bryan Rosen for writing the awesome warm up. I have been stuck at 415# since February. Today hit a 435# PR! 345 - 355 385 - 395 - 395 405 - 415 - 425 - 435 M/34/5’11”/240
Comment URL copied!
Chris Sinagoga
September 12th, 2019 at 12:32 am
Commented on: 190912
Champions Club Scaling Notes: RANT: I'm not sure why exactly, but the L-sits really seem to be doing a number to help deadlifts. Another coach I work with does them between every set of deadlifts on days like this. But since the deadlift is just another form of a squat, the SLIPS can apply the same way they did for back squats: Scales - arches in the feet while hinging at the hip L-sit - pulling from a hips/midline perspective Inversion(Handstand) - the descent from the handstand is the lowering of a deadlift with some added midline tension Plank - to me, this one has the most carry over, especially when you extend the arms out a bit. Stretching - that thing you say you do after the session but really you don't. But the pike position would be a good one here. Lastly, the feel on this is important. You can feel these in your quads, hamstrings, abs, butt, or even shoulders. The lower-back is where we don't want to feel this one. So use that to judge how many reps and sets to do. Check the Compare-to for the scaling notes last time.
Comment URL copied!
Juan Acevedo
September 12th, 2019 at 12:02 am
Commented on: 190912
INTENDED STIMULUS . Heavy day! Last Friday we went for the heaviest single squat we could manage. Today let's maximize total volume. This means we are not aiming for a PR. We are aiming to make each set as heavy as our mechanics will allow from the very first one to the last. This will guarantee that we move a $h1t-ton of weight when all the reps are added up, even though we might not hit the heaviest single we could. You should warm-up well before you start so that that first set of five is solid and heavy. Athletes familiar with this lift but not yet proficient can work sets of three instead of singles. Athletes new to the deadlift should work on drills to develop solid form. TECHNIQUE TIP: Google "Westside Barbell - The Chair Deadlift with Louie Simmons" 👊 SLIPS THE TARGET GAME👊 The target game For each movement, you will set up a target. Hold each position for as long as you can. You lose when your body touches the mark. How long can you hold? â–¶ OPTION 1 Deadlift 5-5-5-3-3-3-3-3-3 reps â–¶ OPTION 2 5 SuperSets 10 barbell good mornings 10 Chair Deadlifts (watch Simmons video) 4 SuperSets 8 slow descent KB deadlifts 4/4 single leg deadlift
Comment URL copied!
Juan Acevedo
September 12th, 2019 at 12:02 am
Link for slips game: https://youtu.be/wwchTUnQinA
Comment URL copied!
Juan Acevedo
September 12th, 2019 at 12:03 am
Link for Louie's video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CE3JBeDf_dg
Comment URL copied!
Bennett Novak
September 12th, 2019 at 1:54 am
Juan, as always thanks for taking the time to put this together and especially for the videos. I have a very specific need for tomorrow’s workout to break down as much fat as possible, but still following mainsite. Would the target game be the best approach for this or would you recommend a different slips variation?
Comment URL copied!