CrossFit | Lowering the Bar on the Low-Fat Diet

Lowering the Bar on the Low-Fat Diet

1
ByCrossFitDecember 20, 2019

In this 2016 editorial, Dr. David Ludwig outlines the breadth and implications of the U.S. government’s widespread calls to reduce fat intake beginning in the 1970s.

Ludwig describes the events as follows:

Beginning in the 1970s, the US government and major professional nutrition organizations recommended that individuals in the United States eat a low-fat/high-carbohydrate diet, launching arguably the largest public health experiment in history. Throughout the ensuing 40 years, the prevalence of obesity and diabetes increased several-fold, even as the proportion of fat in the US diet decreased by 25% … . A comprehensive examination of this massive public health failure has not been conducted. Consequently, significant harms persist, with the low-fat diet remaining entrenched in public consciousness and food policy.

Prior to these recommendations, over 40% of Americans’ energy intake came from fat, with whole milk and liberally fattened dishes and sauces commonplace. Also prior to these recommendations, evidence began to emerge suggesting the higher energy density of fat (nine calories per gram compared to four calories per gram for carbohydrate) alongside differences in the ways fat and carbohydrate metabolism are regulated made fat more obesogenic than carbohydrate. What followed was a rapid shift in public policy in which all Americans were encouraged to eat less fat and more carbohydrate, with even sugar presented as a suitable alternative to fat (1). These recommendations persisted in full force into the 1990s, when the Healthy People 2000 goals called on the food industry to increase the availability of processed low-fat foods (2). The food industry complied, replacing the fat in their foods with additional starches and sugars.

Since these recommendations, fat intake has fallen to near the recommended levels, while obesity has tripled and the incidence of a variety of metabolic diseases increased to an even greater extent. More recently, more rigorous trials have shown low-carbohydrate diets lead to greater weight loss, lower risk of weight gain, and improved metabolic health relative to low-fat diets (3). Meanwhile, publicly funded trials have failed to find benefits related to the use of low-fat diets (4).

Despite this evidence, much of the U.S. population continues to avoid fat as the failure of low-fat diets and relative success of low-carb diets have not been effectively communicated. Nutritional policy in schools continues to promote and subsidize low-fat, high-sugar foods (for example, banning whole milk while allowing sugar-sweetened nonfat milks). The link between sugar and heart disease is still viewed by many in the public health community as equivocal, despite the fact that much of the contrary evidence is now known to be the result of a concerted research effort funded by the sugar industry (5).

This situation persists, in part, due to a dearth of public funds dedicated to research of any diets other than the low-fat diet. Additional funding would allow for larger, more rigorous trials, which would be expected to further support the strong existing evidence supporting low-carbohydrate diets for health and weight loss.

Alternate dietary approaches deserve consideration, Ludwig argues, and the damage of the low-fat era must be undone.

Comments on Lowering the Bar on the Low-Fat Diet

1 Comments

Comment thread URL copied!
Back to 191221
Mary Dan Eades
December 21st, 2019 at 6:51 pm
Commented on: Lowering the Bar on the Low-Fat Diet

In 1996, I believe it was, we attended a conference at Southwestern Medical School on Dietary Fats and Oils in Human Health. The dietary luminaries of the day (McGarry, Astrup, Willett, and others) presented data that clearly showed that the low fat diet had failed in every possible way it had been supposed to succeed -- weight loss, cancer reduction, diabetes control, and on and on. Mike and I were attendees at the conference and we sat in the audience with our Protein Power mindset listening to the speakers one after another admit that the low fat diet had not proved to be the solution everyone had believed it would be, and more importantly, that they had explicitly and unreservedly told the American (and global) public that it was. The chief concern, voiced in back and forth discussions among the speakers on the stage, was that now they couldn't reverse course because after the debacle of recommending salt restriction for everyone on Earth (which turned out to be bad advice as well) the public would never believe them again if they came out and said 'oops! we were wrong about restricting dietary fat.' And that was 26 years ago now and those same people (the ones still alive at least) who were on that stage admitting the low-fat failure are mostly still pushing the same bad advice. Sad. And really, worse than sad. Harmful. And shameful.

Comment URL copied!