Single-Day Tickets to the 2025 CrossFit Games Now on Sale! — GET TICKETS NOW

Tuesday

200728

Workout of the Day

83

Complete as many rounds as possible in 7 minutes of:

20 dumbbell push presses
40 double-unders

♀ 35-lb. DBs ♂ 50-lb. DBs

Post rounds completed to comments.
Compare to 181023.

Comments on The Toxic Truth About Sugar

3 Comments

Comment thread URL copied!
Greg Fairbanks
July 29th, 2020 at 5:50 pm
Commented on: The Toxic Truth About Sugar

Use the knowledge to benefit the health of yourself, your families, and those close to you. The strongest, smartest, most diligent have always been more successful. It's not up to government to regulate what is good for you!

Comment URL copied!
Tyler Hass
July 29th, 2020 at 7:49 am
Commented on: The Toxic Truth About Sugar

I’m of mixed minds on this. The libertarian in me wants to keep the government out of my diet as much as possible. However, it’s hard to observe the health devastation around me and not want to do something. Taxes on sugar sweetened beverages have been tried in a few places. Berkeley, CA placed a 2 cent/oz tax on sugary drinks. Seattle did the same. In both cases consumption dropped by around 20%. Of course, coffee beverages were exempt even though Starbucks drinks can be massive sugar bombs. The argument was that it would place a heavy burden on coffee shops to account for every shot of syrup. Then why not tax the syrup? For soda dispensers, they taxed the syrup so there is precedent for this. I think politicians just like their caramel frappuccinos too much.


Some cities tried to disallow sugary foods from food stamp programs, but were shut down by the USDA. That’s unfortunate. Poor people have less access to healthy options in a lot of areas. If they couldn’t spend food stamps on junk food, I’m sure healthier options would find their way into the food deserts.


A good start might be to stop subsidizing food crops that turn into junk food. Corn, wheat and soy being good examples. We already placed an import tax on cane sugar. But this was mainly just a protectionist measure for our farmers. Corn syrup was an easy replacement for cane sugar.

Comment URL copied!
Erin Wysmuller
July 29th, 2020 at 11:41 am

I completely agree. I don’t think the first step is to tax or ban any products. That could lead to banning or taxing of other things the government thinks is unhealthy, such as red meat. And they do not have a great track record of knowing what is and isn’t healthy for us. But decreasing farm subsidies would be a great first step. Also, actually looking at the totality of the evidence when creating government guidelines (or just decreasing the impact of these guidelines altogether) could move us in a better direction as well. Luckily they are continuing to recommend less sugar, but when you also decrease fat intake to such a low level food becomes bland and people don’t want it. So they end up overeating anyway, and most likely they reach for the sugary/processed foods even though they know it isn’t good for them.

Comment URL copied!