August 17, 2007

Friday 070817

"Michael"

Three rounds for time of:
Run 800 meters
50 Back Extensions
50 Sit-ups

Post time to comments.

Compare to 070522.

BurgSnatchInstruction3-th.jpg

Enlarge image

Snatch Instruction, Mike Burgener - video [wmv] [mov]

Posted by lauren at August 17, 2007 9:28 AM
Comments

Funny. I was going to do this workout anyway.

Comment #1 - Posted by: Paul at August 16, 2007 7:37 PM

Quick question. kinda new. Is it ok to do sit-ups while locking your feet into a bench or something or does this make you use your legs too much?

Comment #2 - Posted by: Michael at August 16, 2007 7:43 PM

man this is going to be fun

Comment #3 - Posted by: zach at August 16, 2007 7:47 PM

At CrossFit NYC we've made some pretty cool videos of our members, but now they're making their own videos.

Here's Brian, our youngest member at 17 years old, doing an OHS workout at home (95#, both snatch and clean grips):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KZpxvDXv1A

And doing a track workout that included sprinting, muscle ups on the goal post, a back flip, and jumping pistols:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLT3STYsNT4

Comment #4 - Posted by: AllisonNYC at August 16, 2007 7:47 PM

Question??:

I'm wondering if the video clips are like a suggestion of what we can also do that day, for example, is today's video a suggestion to work snatches, or was tuesdays Greg and Mallee tabata video a suggestion to maybe work that?? OR am I reading way too much into it and the video's are randomly posted?? Thoughts??

Comment #5 - Posted by: Alex at August 16, 2007 7:49 PM

Pain, without love
Pain, I can't get enough
Pain, I like it rough
'Cause I'd rather feel pain than nothing at all...

Comment #6 - Posted by: Chucky B at August 16, 2007 8:08 PM

AllisonNYC,

That is a great video, thanks for posting the link.
I'm impressed with the goalpost muscle ups, I've had mixed success with bar muscle-ups (doesn't feel natural). Your athlete made it seem easy.

I am definitely going to have to try those jumping pistols.

Comment #7 - Posted by: Gonzo at August 16, 2007 8:12 PM

Great video, that's the way I want to train the olympic movements to my clients.

Comment #8 - Posted by: gaucoin at August 16, 2007 8:25 PM

I guessed that today would either be a heavy lifting day or "Michael." My abs are still sore from Monday, so this should be interesting.

Comment #9 - Posted by: CBR Chitown at August 16, 2007 8:30 PM

I'm one fairly irrelevant voice, but I haven't been into these workouts lately. Many of them are almost like...overkill. Hate to say it, but I'm thinking about going back to following some of the Gym Jones stuff. Those are tough, focused, and generally pretty interesting. Posting this just to hear the arguments against doing that, because I probably don't know enough yet.

Comment #10 - Posted by: Janice at August 16, 2007 8:31 PM

To #5 Alex

You know Alex, i was wondering the same thing last week. I think they ARE just randomly posted...however with the intent of application. But even if they're not, you might just wanna apply them anyway...
After all...there's no such thing as being "too fit"

Comment #11 - Posted by: Derek O at August 16, 2007 8:33 PM

Dear Chucky B,
I love pain too. In fact I really like the pain from a good lactic acid burn out, or the pain of hitting some one really hard. But what I detest and hate with passion is the feeling I get when Pukie gets a hold of me. I don't call that pain, I call that suffering. And yet... I can't get enough of him either.

Work out took me way too long today. To much hiking, booze, pot, sleeping in the wilderness, makes for a tough first day back work out I had to walk some of my last mile.

Comment #12 - Posted by: Oregon Lacrosse #39 at August 16, 2007 8:49 PM

I will perform this workout in the name of Lt. Michael McGreevy.

Comment #13 - Posted by: Oregon Lacrosse #39 at August 16, 2007 8:55 PM

@Gonzo: glad you liked the videos. Yeah, Brian has a way of making everything look easy. We find it very annoying. :)

If it's any consolation to you, he studies gymnastics (although only for the past year).

Comment #14 - Posted by: AllisonNYC at August 16, 2007 8:55 PM

R & B CANT WAIT TO SEE YOU ON THE PLAYING FIELD TOMARROW

xoxo

Comment #15 - Posted by: ZAC PINE at August 16, 2007 8:59 PM

yea I was also wondering about the sit-ups, do you guys do them with the same thing that you would do back extensions with or do you just do regular sit-ups.

Comment #16 - Posted by: colin at August 16, 2007 9:11 PM

#15 Colin

Some do regular sit-ups, with or without an abmat. It doesn't specify, so your choice.

Personally, I do GHD sit-ups (check the FAQ and videos) using the GHD ("the same thing that you would do back extensions with. . ."). It makes it harder and slower.

Comment #17 - Posted by: ScottH at August 16, 2007 9:17 PM

# 9 Janice

Just curious, what you mean my overkill?

Comment #18 - Posted by: tank at August 16, 2007 9:21 PM

Is there something i can substitute for back extensions or someway i can improvise for the equipment? Im having trouble with lack of equipment right now

Comment #19 - Posted by: Ben at August 16, 2007 9:32 PM

Janice...one more thing,

in my opinion, Gym Jones is a group of athletes with sport specific training goals in mind.

I see no problem with mixing in the occasional workout you find on the Gym Jones website for a little flare. However, unless you have a sport specific athletic goal in mind and know how workouts are structured to achieve that goal, I would stick to Crossfit for the principle of "broad, general and inclusive fitness".

Comment #20 - Posted by: tank at August 16, 2007 9:40 PM

#9 Janice

I have been doing crossfit now for about four months and have been VERY impressed, to say the least, in the results I have gotten. Being tall and thin, I initially found the heavy lifting days very difficult, but over time with practice and watching nearly all the instructional videos this site has to offer, I have greatly improved. I recently got my wife involved, and, let me tell you, physical fitness has never been her cup of tea. I found it very helpful for her if I drastically scale the workout down. I make sure she works out the same target muscle groups and sticks to the core WOD, but the reps and/or the weight are always modified. It is not about sticking to the workout verbatim. It is about discovering your physical ability and working on improving yourself. Everybody has their own goals and looks for different results in a workout program. If you're looking to stay in prime physical shape when it comes to cardiovascular endurance and strength while maintaining a relatively short workout duration, then crossfit is the place to stay. I believe that if you give it time and patience, you will be pleased.

Comment #21 - Posted by: Skeletor at August 16, 2007 10:06 PM

#18 Ben - I'm not sure if it's a standard sub or not, but I do my back extensions on the floor - lay face down, hands behind your head, lift the head and legs at the same time using your back muscles. I've seen the same with arms extended forward called "supermans." The other option I've seen is doing Good Mornings but I'm not sure how much weight is expected for those, if any.

Comment #22 - Posted by: PVD at August 16, 2007 10:11 PM

Dude...that's Kevin Riddle in the background with the TapouT shirt on.

- P

Comment #23 - Posted by: PC at August 16, 2007 10:15 PM

#4 AllisonNYC - Giving Bryan his 15 minutes of fame. Very impressive little buddy. Keep up the good work.

Comment #24 - Posted by: TAC at August 16, 2007 10:18 PM

#20 PVD

Thanks very much!!

Comment #25 - Posted by: Ben at August 16, 2007 10:26 PM

Hmm I wonder if these are random or do we get a third hero tomorrow?
Must admit I called deadlifts today...but am quite glad to see Michael instead.

Comment #26 - Posted by: Cal Jones at August 16, 2007 10:57 PM


Good workout! I did decline sit-ups instead of regular sit-ups, I feel more of a burn when I do declines.

As rx'd

Time 22:48

-Chris
USMC 2/1

Comment #27 - Posted by: CHRIS at August 17, 2007 12:13 AM

today was the first time i have done murph and got to say it is tough, but the bad thing was i forgot to press start on the timer, what do you think should i do it again.

Comment #28 - Posted by: lee 22 at August 17, 2007 12:22 AM

as rx'd in 28:04. did the first two rounds of extensions and situps on my roman chair, then switched to the abmat... My first murph and my third xfit WOD...thanks as always and keep them coming!...

Comment #29 - Posted by: Daniel S at August 17, 2007 12:31 AM

Day #2, it's going to hurt. About time I stopped lurking and stepped up to the plate for my punishment.

I'm going to call it, 2 rounds tops, 800yds/25 back extensions/20 sit ups and at least a half hour.
At least this is good core development, I sure need it.

Comment #30 - Posted by: DirtyErnie at August 17, 2007 12:45 AM

35/M/83kg

Can't run, did my usual double sub of 800m run = 1000m row = 100 SDHPs @ 20kg.

3 rounds
100 SHDPs @ 20kg
50 no-momentum straight leg situps
50 back extensions on the floor

26:56.16

All situps and back extensions unbroken, all SDHP rounds broken.

Note - any situps in large numbers are a bad idea for me. Got mat burn again, literally bleed from it. Next time I'll do v-ups or bicycles or something else for my abs. No more situps, period. Not worth the torn up skin.

Comment #31 - Posted by: PVD at August 17, 2007 1:08 AM

Haven't reported in lately:

19/m/72.5kg

13/8: Grace(45kg)=4:45, max.C&J=75kg(pr), max.KipPU=22(pr), max.dips=16
14/8: 40-30-20-10 of hPU,DU,GHDSU,BE=32:45
15/8: 5k=18:17(pr)
17/8: max.DL=150kg(pr)

abs still a bit sore, but otherwise feeling AWESOME! might do Murph in the AM, and Michael in the PM tomorrow and put an end to that. :)

Comment #32 - Posted by: timh at August 17, 2007 2:23 AM

As Stated:

24 minutes

Last sit-ups were killer, but a relatively easy workout in comparison to the last few days, well needed core work felt good!!

Comment #33 - Posted by: Chris B at August 17, 2007 2:46 AM

Subbed 3 minute cycle sprints for 800s.

20:50

Comment #34 - Posted by: Brent Dodge at August 17, 2007 3:00 AM

Subbed Good mornings for back ext.

2 rounds in 35:30

Comment #35 - Posted by: Scott C. at August 17, 2007 3:44 AM

"Michael"
As Rx'd
Military Sit-ups
Time: 22:20

Comment #36 - Posted by: HarryHogg at August 17, 2007 4:21 AM

CFWUx2

Did 5x5 overhead squats instead
35-40-45-50-55 kg

Comment #37 - Posted by: Woody at August 17, 2007 4:25 AM

CFWUx2 (-sit-ups)

26:18

About 6 1/2 minutes off my PR. I did it outside with good mornings (13 lbs) and unanchored ab mat sit-ups, which were much harder than my usual anchored sit-ups! I think I will do those from now on.

Comment #38 - Posted by: Mary Ann at August 17, 2007 4:27 AM

Thanks AllisonNYC. I didn't know there so many You Tube videos showing so many excerises.

Comment #39 - Posted by: Adam W at August 17, 2007 4:30 AM

#19-Ben

As a substitute for back extensions, I found that "Good Mornings" are perfect especially if you are having an issue with equipment.

Comment #40 - Posted by: Cmack at August 17, 2007 4:46 AM

M/48/70"/176

"Michael"

Three rounds for time of:
Run 800 meters SUB Row
50 Back Extensions
50 Sit-ups

22:44

Comment #41 - Posted by: Louis Herrera Jr. at August 17, 2007 4:48 AM

F/32yo/5'10"/153#
As Rx-25:29

M/29yo/6'4"/202#
As Rx-28:19
Still limping through my runs, but it's done!!

Comment #42 - Posted by: Damon & Laura, Sonz Decatur at August 17, 2007 4:51 AM

#31 - I thought I was the only one with "mat burn" - much politer than what I've always called it. I get it less with knees-up situps than with straight-legged ones, but I still have large raw spots from working 50 situps a week ago (at least they're finally scabbing).

I try to sub hollow rock - which in my case is still more of a flat rock. But I figure a 30-second hold is more-or-less equivalent to 10 straight-legged situps. It feels about the same, anyway.

Comment #43 - Posted by: annlee at August 17, 2007 4:57 AM

21:02

Broke 23 minutes.. finally!

running: 8.2 mph, 8.5, 8.0

Comment #44 - Posted by: Hale at August 17, 2007 4:59 AM

27m/194#
last time scaled to 35's @ 25:30
today as rx'd 33:09

Comment #45 - Posted by: benji at August 17, 2007 5:13 AM

age 41
bwt 210#
15 min. stat. bike
15 min. c2 rower
300 jump ropes w/ 20# vest
CFWU minus situps and back ext.
WOD-23:42 as rx'd.

Comment #46 - Posted by: MSR at August 17, 2007 5:20 AM

M/34/150

25:49

No GHD, did back extensions and sit ups on the ground.

Comment #47 - Posted by: Motomouse at August 17, 2007 5:33 AM

Slow and steady today. Just really focused on form (thats code for I am still absolutely smoked from yesterday).

as rx, 26:30.

Next time I think i will be under 24:00

Hooyah, and get some all. 3-2-1-GO!

Comment #48 - Posted by: Aaron at August 17, 2007 5:34 AM

Janice #10,

If you cannot learn to scale the workouts to your tolerance (physiological and psychological) for intensity then going back to Gym Jones may very well work for you. You might also consider going to Jeff and Mikki Martin's CrossFit Kid's, www.crossfitkids.com, they too do a fantastic job of scaling the CrossFit stimulus for newbies and have a long standing appreciation and knowledge of mechanics.

Comment #49 - Posted by: Coach at August 17, 2007 5:43 AM

as rx'd

in door (iraq is hot) on treadmill
2418

Comment #50 - Posted by: Greg at August 17, 2007 5:46 AM

last time
070325
at home

sub 20# DB good morning for Back Extension
unanchored sit-ups

33:52

this time
070817
at home

sub 20# DB good morning for Back Extension
unanchored sit-ups

36:33

Comment #51 - Posted by: EMelton at August 17, 2007 5:50 AM

29F, 5'3", 109bw

Murph: 38:27 (partitioned to 5-10-15 this morning)
Michael: 22:16 (ironically did this a few days ago)

Although yesterday was my rest day, I feel like I deserve another one. It was already over 80 degrees at 7am.

Comment #52 - Posted by: Jill G - BTB CF at August 17, 2007 5:56 AM

5 min rope skipping + CFWUx3 (minus situps an d back extensions)

WOD: 20:59

- Sit ups on Roman Chair
- Supermans instead of Back extensions

Comment #53 - Posted by: Leroy - Holland at August 17, 2007 6:08 AM

36yom 150lbs

CFWU x3

Short on time so scaled to pack 35back xtensions 35 situps
25:08:88

Comment #54 - Posted by: AlanR at August 17, 2007 6:08 AM

16:04 as rx'd

Comment #55 - Posted by: paulw at August 17, 2007 6:15 AM

CFWU, WOD as rxd...22m34s...run got easier as i loosened up after murph yesterday...and coach, thanks again for creating and continually improving the, without a doubt, best fitness program getting around...i for one like that its difficult, like that it hurts and like that i improve through hard work...this isnt easy and for those considering giving up cause its 'overkill', well, i would suggest you have a mental toughness hurdle to get over, not necessarily a physical one!! great work coach...

Comment #56 - Posted by: charlie from aus at August 17, 2007 6:16 AM

#28 Lee

You should do it 3 more times and take the average.

Comment #57 - Posted by: Chris at August 17, 2007 6:19 AM

18/m/160
Michael is gonna hurt the day after Murph. BTW
Murph as rx'd with 20lb vest
44:56
Sucked but I'll do better next time. Vest caught me off guard.

Comment #58 - Posted by: Kurt at August 17, 2007 6:20 AM

18/m/160
Michael is gonna hurt the day after Murph. BTW
Murph as rx'd with 20lb vest
44:56
Time is horrible but I'll do better next time. The vest caught me off guard.

Comment #59 - Posted by: Kurt at August 17, 2007 6:21 AM

3 rounds: 40 minutes. Back extensions done on an exercise ball.

Comment #60 - Posted by: Kira at August 17, 2007 6:26 AM

I've got a couple of quick questions...my abs are still hurting from Monday such that I can't stand up straight yet. How do you know when you're overdoing it? Is it worth doing a workout all-out, only to need about a full week of rest before being able to do another?

Comment #61 - Posted by: Poe at August 17, 2007 6:30 AM

I love this workout! This will be fun!

Comment #62 - Posted by: Biggdave at August 17, 2007 6:32 AM

Male 35, 175-180
Time 15:44
Did the back extensions and sit-ups off a Swiss ball. Used a treadmill.
I'm getting more fit or I'm at least getting used to being in pain but not easing up. Either way, it's a good day.

Comment #63 - Posted by: flip at August 17, 2007 6:34 AM

Seems I have a lurking competitor now, I'm going to go smoke this today...

Comment #64 - Posted by: Angry G at August 17, 2007 6:36 AM

I will do this after work, I can't wait! I am calling for Fran as tomorrow's WOD. We'll see.

Comment #65 - Posted by: Harry at August 17, 2007 6:43 AM

33/M/208

I love to hate this workout. I still have to break sets on situps and back extensions; if I don't, my back gets so tight I can't run fast at all.
800 X 3 on treadmill
Unanchored situps with rolled up towel under lower back
Regular back extensions
26:19

Comment #66 - Posted by: moak at August 17, 2007 6:53 AM

M23 187#

I'm a day behind on workouts. Did "Murph", sans body armor.

Time = 43:35
1st mile = 6:30
Last mile = 7:30

Took roughly 10 min. per exercise for pull-ups, push-ups, and squats.

Somehow did not meet Pukie, highly unusual from past experience with "Murph"

Comment #67 - Posted by: JohnS. at August 17, 2007 7:08 AM

37/m/178

24:08

Did 0.5 mile run on treadmill, sit-ups using Abmat.

Splits increased 30 - 45 seconds with each subsequent round.

Comment #68 - Posted by: Holbie at August 17, 2007 7:17 AM

bw: 185

Heavy day for me, deadlift 7 x 3 x 160kg (352#)

Comment #69 - Posted by: Rick510 at August 17, 2007 7:19 AM

Janice #10: Coach is being too polite to say so, but CrossFit (which he originated) is a superior fitness protocol in every way to Gym Jones, which is a uncredited, and inferior, derivative of CrossFit.

CrossFit is hard, no question, and sometimes the workouts seem cruel. You must learn to regulate the intensity to avoid burnout, and that means checking your ego at the door. For example, Murph is still a hell of a workout done at half volume.

I suggest you commit to the following if you really want to see what CrossFit can do for you:

Do ALL of the workouts on a 3-on 1-off schedule (follow the national WOD) with the following caveat:

every 4th week is to be done at 1/2 volume
every 12th week is to taken COMPLETLEY off (jogging, biking, etc. allowed, no intense excercise).

Eat Zone-Paleo: 30/30/40, meat, veg, fruit, nut, seed, maybe dairy, avoid starch, sugar, alcohol.

report back here in 6 months about what has happened to your strength, endurance, stamina, power, speed, flexibility, balance, coordination, accuracy, agility.

One caveat: this is broad, general and inclusive fitness: if you want to look "buff" (but actually be much weaker than you look)this is not the best program, despite what coach has stated, this program does not cause significant hypertrophy compared to traditional bodybuilding, powerlifting protocols.

Comment #70 - Posted by: Maximus at August 17, 2007 7:20 AM

23:55

on a tm, btwn 7.5mph-8.5mph

pr stands at 22:34

need to get the run times down

Comment #71 - Posted by: Brett_nyc at August 17, 2007 7:26 AM

287#/43 yom

as rx'd 35:32

Comment #72 - Posted by: Kegger at August 17, 2007 7:27 AM

"Poe" #60 said:

Q:"I've got a couple of quick questions...my abs are still hurting from Monday such that I can't stand up straight yet. How do you know when you're overdoing it? Is it worth doing a workout all-out, only to need about a full week of rest before being able to do another?"

A: You know your overdoing it when your abs hurt so much after 5 days that you cannot stand up straight.

I suggest the following: Scale all of the workouts back for a week to 50% volume and/or weight. Does this fix the problem? If yes scale to 75%, if not scale to 25%. Get the idea? Play with it.

I remember the first time I did "Linda". I insisted, despite being told not to, on doing it at full volume. took over 2 hours and I did not work out again for three weeks.

Comment #73 - Posted by: Maximus at August 17, 2007 7:28 AM

m/35/215

29:27

...almost saw pukie

Comment #74 - Posted by: agc at August 17, 2007 7:35 AM

As PX'd

23:31.3

Comment #75 - Posted by: Olivia at August 17, 2007 7:48 AM

Subbed be with good mornings
bit more than 800m runs

25:18

Comment #76 - Posted by: SueAnne at August 17, 2007 7:53 AM

Michael

Once again, deceptively simple on paper. Quite brutal in reality.

40/m/182

all done outdoors, lovely balmy heat index of 97, gotta love it!

35:08 as rx'd

(had to rig up a homemade back extension, using a flat bench, 2 inflatable balance discs, placed just under each hip, elevated the bench on cinderblocks, hooked feet under spotter bar of power rack, worked very well)

Comment #77 - Posted by: Tim Hamilton at August 17, 2007 7:53 AM

#10 janice and all her responders:

i agree, some of the WODs have felt like overkill recently, but i believe that is part of the challenge. sometimes you just need to muscle through a workout mentally and physically over a longer period than 15 minutes, b/c the challenges in life and sport sometimes last over 15 minutes as well. also, i've only been doing these WODs for a bit over a month, but it already seems like they cycle through longer workouts like murph ( or the 50-40-30-20-10 fiasco several days ago) and shorter, higher-load routines. so i think i see where it's going...

that being said, i have not looked at WOD in a while and said... "hmmm, i did NOT see that coming." in other words, i agree, i haven't found anything interesting recently. rather, i say to myself, "holy s, how am i going to get through that?"

and finally... so much repressed (and not so repressed) hostility towards mark twight and gymjones! sure, he may be a derivative of crossfit, as someone mentioned, but that doesn't lessen his program's effectiveness for his clients (who, remember, pay him nothing and willingly allow him to kick their asses). he may have his own sport-specific goals in mind at times, but no one can question his imagination, dedication, and fitness level - he is a true beast. and do not underestimate the amount of interest his association with 300 has brought to the style of exercise in general and to crossfit specifically - i would not have found this site had i not been looking for his.

Comment #78 - Posted by: esteban at August 17, 2007 8:04 AM

got super pumped to make my parallettes yesterday that i made a slight oversight and only 3 90 degree elbows, and one friggin 45 degree elbow. my mom heard me all the way up stairs when i made this discovery, and i was in the basement mind you. so i'll have to go rip apart my abs while my dad picks me up one 90 degree elbow after work. disappointed in myself, but still pumped to try them out tonight.

CROSSFIT, the decathlon of all workout regimes.

Comment #79 - Posted by: Pfeif-a-Life at August 17, 2007 8:13 AM

m/37/6ft/168

3 rounds of:
~900m run
50 supermans
50 regular sit-ups

Time: 26:54

Sucks that not a single gym around here has a GHD. I suspect my time would look a lot different using one of those for this WOD...

Comment #80 - Posted by: crazyXgerman at August 17, 2007 8:21 AM

Age: 42
BW: 164

CFWUx3 (minus situps, back extensions, dips (wrist injury))

As Rx'd, w/GHD situps & BEs

26:47 compared to 25:42 on 05-23-2006
I don't think I did GHD situps last time, though...

Comment #81 - Posted by: OCMike at August 17, 2007 8:23 AM

M/37/175

Abs still sore from L-pullups the other day...

As Rx'd: 32:08

Last time 28 minutes modified -- Back extensions kick my butt...

Comment #82 - Posted by: Chris M at August 17, 2007 8:33 AM

I'm calling it now. Tomorrow will be JT!
Did Michael at my local track, had to sub "superman's" in place of back extensions
Time:16:55

Comment #83 - Posted by: Angel at August 17, 2007 8:36 AM

28yom/216#

32 minutes, my lower back seized right up and made this really interesting.

Comment #84 - Posted by: conorb at August 17, 2007 8:40 AM

16:27

If you think its overkill you aren't ready to do Rx'd WODs. Scale for now.

I'm going with CFT tomorrow, we haven't had it in awhile.

Comment #85 - Posted by: Angry G at August 17, 2007 8:43 AM

15:31

Subbed 3 180 meter shuttles (sprinting with lots of direction change) with 30 second breaks in between for the 800's...also subbed good mornings for back extensions.

5th day of crossfit and loving it!

Comment #86 - Posted by: Kentucky9 at August 17, 2007 8:44 AM

oh and subbed GHD situps because I failed at reading the wod correctly.

Comment #87 - Posted by: conorb at August 17, 2007 8:45 AM

Janice #10, the WODs go through different phases. There was a strength emphasis around June-July. Lately, it has been more on running and random movements. Check out Brand-X for scaling.

Stick it out, and you'll be surprised at how your outlook changes. A couple months ago, if I saw Michael after Murph, I would've yelled "What the ****?"

But when I saw it posted last night, I jumped up and said "**** yes!!" Maybe CF kills brain cells.

Finally, thanks for classic thought. "CF is overkill. I'm doing Gym Jones." Hang in there.

Comment #88 - Posted by: gant at August 17, 2007 8:46 AM

Janice - Coach designs the WODs to be VERY taxing for Elite Athletes and those striving to become stronger and faster! I invite you to take a look at the times and loads posted here over the last few weeks - these people are serious, highly competetive, CF monsters!

The potency of these workouts will most assuredly CRUSH the unsuspecting newcomer - who isn't properly scaling. and recovering.

Comment #89 - Posted by: John Messano at August 17, 2007 8:50 AM

21:21
Subbed row for run, treadmill is broken

Comment #90 - Posted by: jbean at August 17, 2007 8:53 AM

K-
WU-squats and that's funny, I can't remember what else
WOD-
For once I did Michael almost correctly, or at least as close as I can get to right now.
subs-
800 m row for run
BE broken into sets of 12 and 13 for each round
Anchored situps, 1st rnd broken 40 & 10; 2nd rnd broken 30 & 20, 3rd rnd broken 25, 15, 10

Time- 33:40

N-
WU- row 500 m
run 800 m
unanchored sit ups 1st rnd, anchored 2nd & 3rd, broken in bits and pieces
BE broken in bits and pieces

Time- 44:40

Kate

Comment #91 - Posted by: jknl at August 17, 2007 9:01 AM

#68 - Maximus

Although I respect your opinion of Gym Jones, I have to disagree with how you stated it. Crossfit is actually acknowledged on the Gym Jones site numerous times. You also state that is it inferior as if that is fact. Perhaps it is for you, but that does not mean it is for everyone.

I also disagree with the looking "buff" but being weaker than you look. I know quite a few huge guys and they are NOT weaker than they appear. They can move a huge amount of weight in the exercises they do. When it comes to throwing in some athletic or balance moves they suffer. If it comes to running a miles in less than 6 minutes, they suffer. So they are not weaker than they look, they are just very specialized and are not great at a broad range of activities.

Overall, I agree with what you are saying but it is how you say it that makes it come off as arrogant, and in fact makes you sounds a lot like Mark Twight. Although Crossfit has a lot of elite athletes using it for training, it does not need to have an elitist attitude.

Comment #92 - Posted by: Corey at August 17, 2007 9:02 AM

20 min. 17 sec.

Really wanted to break the 20 min. mark but that last set of back extensions took forever. Burned through the last set of situps to compensate, but not quite fast enough.

Comment #93 - Posted by: rcurriejr at August 17, 2007 9:02 AM

Is the 50% week and 12th week off a CF protocol, or just a general training principle? I am curious as I have seen references today and in the past. I don't feel that run down, but I am curious as to the idea behind that, and if it is a good idea. Thanks for any feedback from the CF community!

Been on CF since May 1, and that would put me a little over 12 weeks I guess.

Comment #94 - Posted by: Joel at August 17, 2007 9:03 AM

Bwt: 133

As Rx'd:

15:20

Regular sit-ups

Comment #95 - Posted by: Speal at August 17, 2007 9:03 AM

#76 esteban-
Generally, anger is directed toward a thief.
If you want to know all that has been discussed about Mark Twight and Gym Jones already, then do a search through the CF website of the past comment sections. Very informative.

#82 Angry G-
I was going to say CFT also, but probably now we've jinxed it!

Kate

Comment #96 - Posted by: jknl at August 17, 2007 9:04 AM

21/m/127

As RX'd, 23:18
800 times: 3:05, 3:25, 3:46

Gosh I hate core work of all kinds! So bad at it...

Conorb: this is also the first time I read Micheal correctly and *didn't* do GHD situps. What a difference it makes in time!

Comment #97 - Posted by: Ryan Whipple at August 17, 2007 9:06 AM

esteban

I hear you about gymjones. But I think most people here lost respect for Mark Twight because of certain written statements on his website threatening street violence against people who steal his "original" program, or ideas.

In fact, however, it seems that the source of his "original" program is Coach and Crossfit. So that contradiction sort of irritates some folks here.

This is not to say that Mr. Twight has not added to or improved upon Coach's methods. I wouldn't know, because I've never done a gymjones workout.

Comment #98 - Posted by: bret kleefuss at August 17, 2007 9:10 AM

19:20 RX'd

last 800 killed my time

Comment #99 - Posted by: Chris from Tx at August 17, 2007 9:31 AM

18:27 - rowing, anchored situps and "supermen" in Catherine's hot garage (but not 100 plus degrees today).

Comment #100 - Posted by: Kelly Moore at August 17, 2007 9:42 AM

Correct me if I am wrong, because I know very little about Gym Jones;

but, if our nation’s heroes fully endorse Crossfit compared to a program that is endorsed by heroes falsely created by Hollywood. My first instinct would be that the men and women at Crossfit have a far superior program.

The men and women in our armed forces do not need to look pretty in their uniform, they need to be ready for everything and anything, and that is exactly what Crossfit does.

That is just my impression. I have only glanced over the Gym Jones site, which seems to just be riding on the coat tails of the 300 movie. It does seem that they focus on creating strength, power, and endurance. I just don't like the message they convey on how "exclusive" their program is.

Comment #101 - Posted by: Colin at August 17, 2007 9:49 AM

For #10 Janice and all other new cfitters. It is generally understood that the posted WODs are mind blowing or seem a bit extreme to some new cfitters. That is because they are generally geared to fit the training needs of those so-called CF mosters who've been doing it for years like Brandon, Greg, Annie and Rob. Of course, even these guys WILL BE challenged by those WODs. So naturally, it is the general contention that you should scale down each WOD until such time that you can handle lighter loads for a high amount of reps or run distances over and over with ease even before you can consider moving up in weights and such.
For example take Fran, which is generally considered a staple WOD for evaluating your performance. As Rx'd , it calls for a 95lbs thruster and BW PU. I use 85lbs, because with that weight, I can go 18reps in a row, take a short brake and finish the 21s. And I use kipping PU, but before I could kip, I used to do Jumping PU until I was able to kip. I think you know where I am going with this. It's all about developing strong technique at low intensity and high reps, that way if your technique is spot on, as you move up in weight, you'll naturally become stronger faster over time. Smooth is fast.

Comment #102 - Posted by: Harry at August 17, 2007 9:51 AM

29/M/180

25:53
Previous 23:32

Subbed 4 min. of jump rope & Burpees for 800 run. Wife is days away from delivery and is in agony; everyting irritates her. Therefore, I had to keep the two-year-old in the garage with me. She enjoyed watching me suffer.

Comment #103 - Posted by: edevine at August 17, 2007 10:00 AM

61/m

old dog scaled to "puppy."

23+ min

looking forward to the day when I can strip off my shirt and display my buff, shaved pecs.

Comment #104 - Posted by: TomR at August 17, 2007 10:05 AM

Rest Day for me after 3 straight on.

Janice #10 (and to a lesser degree esteban #76)

I re-read your post a couple of times trying to get to the essence of your observation and discontent. If it is apparant that I've missed it please accept my apology in advance.

"Many of them are...overkill." From this your respondents thus far have deduced that you are new to CF and to the demands of CF, especially the demands of doing WOD's as Rx'd. Is this true? Is this objection simply that the WOD's of late have leaned toward the lengthy and demanding? While I would certainly agree that there appears to be a rather concerted effort on Coach's part to answer any question about whether or not there is enough ab work or running in CF of late, the longer you spend here the more you will realize that there are multiple patterns and trends that arise--a strength cycle, an announced cycle to address insufficient back strength for example. We are apparantly in a cycle that is emphasizing longer, sustained efforts with a sub-emphasis on ab work. More than what you want to or can do? Scale, as suggested quite cordially by Coach.

"Those are tough, focused, and generally pretty interesting." "I haven't found anything interesting recently"--esteban. Hmmm, not sure how to address this point, actually. What defines "interesting"? Must the WOD's amuse as well as exercise? Must there be some exotic exercise or combination involved in order to hold our attention? If you go back some years and look at the main page WOD's you will see more exotic, unusual, and less accessable exercises and combinations (net climbs, tire flips, sledge hammer tire pounds, etc.). Is THIS what you had in mind or were implying with your desire for interesting or surprising? I, too, like to do some of the odder and unusual exercises on occasion, and for that I visit the affiliates pages for some of their more exotic offerings. You could surely use Mr. Twight's routines as well. The front page is the core, the backbone of CF and Coach appears to have made an effort to increase the accesability of CF by using more of the more common exercises, albeit in CF combinations. Not surprised? I quite frankly was stunned to see "Murph" yesterday so soon after our June encounter. Perhaps I lack imagination or am more easily surprised.

"I may be one fairly irrelevant voice...because I probably don't know enough yet." No one is irrelevant here if they approach the community with humility and respect, and if they show a committment to the community. I took the liberty of searching the last couple of months for your name on the comments section to see what kind of results you have been posting (it's Friday afternoon at Skyvision, I had the time, and I have a deskful of paperwork I have to do otherwise). I must confess that I was not terribly surprised to see that you were nowhere to be found. Did I miss you somewhere? If not don't you think that it's somewhat impolite to make your inaugural post so critical? It makes one wonder if you are baiting the community, especially through your choice of Gym Jones as your alternate to CF (catching the relative newcomer, esteban, unaware of the long history between Mr. Twight and CF). If not then how about spending a little time researching the site, attempting appropriately scaled versions of the WOD, and posting your results and any questions you may have as you work toward a fitter you. THAT will solve the problem in your last sentence, and THAT will make your voice relevant.

Otherwise, yup, you are a fairly irrelevant voice.

Comment #105 - Posted by: bingo at August 17, 2007 10:07 AM

Rest Day for me after 3 on. Some thoughts on Janice #10 caught in filters, brilliant of course ;=)

Comment #106 - Posted by: bingo at August 17, 2007 10:09 AM

20:36

Comment #107 - Posted by: Brett J at August 17, 2007 10:11 AM

Completed my first week of crossfit. Have a ways to go still

42 min

Situps took forever.

26M/ 225lbs

Comment #108 - Posted by: JMillz at August 17, 2007 10:17 AM

31/m/215/6'5"

26:38

Comment #109 - Posted by: Corey at August 17, 2007 10:19 AM

24:20

Runs on treadmill at 1% incline. Decline situps, goodmornings with 25# db.

I pushed hard thru this one thinking of McGreevey and this guy: A brother firefighter named Captain Eric Abbt from the Houston Fire Dept. On March 28th, 2007, he was rescuing trapped victims on the 5th floor of a highrise fire and became trapped himself. The video and radio traffic are pretty intense. Here's the link: http://thebravestonline.com/news.html?view=1&id=1619

Thanks Captain Abbt and Lt. McGreevey for the mental "push" to get through this workout.

Comment #110 - Posted by: c.scovil at August 17, 2007 10:20 AM

26:08 as rx'd

tm 8.5, 8.0, 7.5 mph
situps on floor, anchored
back ext on roman chair

Comment #111 - Posted by: John Messano at August 17, 2007 10:23 AM

as rx'd 23:34. 1 min improvement since last time.

Comment #112 - Posted by: Jason R. Brown at August 17, 2007 10:25 AM

Would somebody explain this GymJones thing to me? I'm reading the comments and I'm sensing some history with that and Crossfit. Not to mention the GymJones website makes me think of a cult.

Comment #113 - Posted by: Kurt at August 17, 2007 10:32 AM

17min
3min speed rope for runs
good mornings
floor sit-ups with feet anchored

Comment #114 - Posted by: JDale at August 17, 2007 10:35 AM

M 27 170
Murph 44:07 as Rxed
Michael 21:01 as Rxed

Comment #115 - Posted by: brandonE at August 17, 2007 10:43 AM

29 yom 200#
as Rx'd
back extensions on a swiss ball
13:57

Comment #116 - Posted by: jon Regner at August 17, 2007 10:44 AM

Kurt 105

GymJones used to be a Crossfit affiliate back in the day but apparently had a bit of a falling out. Go to Crossfit Edmontons site and they have the details of the connection of gymjones and crossfit. Gymjones offcourse is the team that trained the 300 actors and stuntmen for the movie.

Crossfit makes you feel at home when you are on its page, where gymjones makes you feel like you are not welcome on his site.

Comment #117 - Posted by: cchpie at August 17, 2007 10:48 AM

24:03

Comment #118 - Posted by: jolie at August 17, 2007 10:55 AM

43 y/o M 225

32:00

Did the run outside at 100 degrees--the heat really slowed me down.

On the last sets of situps and extensions, the power went out. Everyone ran out of the weight room-- I finished my sets.

Any excuse will do if you want to quit.

Comment #119 - Posted by: Steve at August 17, 2007 11:03 AM

37/m/176
29:58 ghd situps

Comment #120 - Posted by: silence at August 17, 2007 11:07 AM

21:25 as xr'd

Comment #121 - Posted by: Phil at August 17, 2007 11:08 AM

20:06 as rx'd

Comment #122 - Posted by: Shug at August 17, 2007 11:08 AM

modified back ext to like static superman kinda thing - 50 seconds...

3 rounds in the glorious annapolis heat and humidity: 21:17

Comment #123 - Posted by: Janell at August 17, 2007 11:08 AM

18 y/o F

modified back ext to like static superman kinda
thing - 50 seconds...

3 rounds in the glorious annapolis heat and humidity: 21:17

Comment #124 - Posted by: Janell at August 17, 2007 11:09 AM

f/24/104

did half micheal as I skipped workout yesterday and had to make up murph today!

also subbed row for run

15:42

(murph time with half reps, full runs and jumping pullups was 30:37)

Comment #125 - Posted by: laura at August 17, 2007 11:12 AM

27:41

Pretty much as rx'd but limited range on back extensions due to equipment limitation. After yesterday's meltdown on Murph I wanted to ensure I finished every last rep on this one.

Comment #126 - Posted by: Rico at August 17, 2007 11:13 AM

41yo/f/165#
As I read the posts I wondering, why is my time so small, I know I am not that good yet at all...lightbulb! I did one round! While doing the WOD I thought nice, coach givin us an easy WOD today:)
WRONG~
Any way
I swam 1500 intervals, then ran treadmill 1 degree incline, .8 mile 50 back ext, 50 crunches on incline bench.

Comment #127 - Posted by: lisaq at August 17, 2007 11:14 AM

45 y/o - 6' - 225#

As RX'd (sub supermans for back extensions)

17:55 (At track)

Comment #128 - Posted by: wtp at August 17, 2007 11:19 AM

46yom 160#
runs 3:03/3:16/3:24
anchored abmat situps
17:13 new pr by 1:07
Abs still hurt from doing all those ghd situps tuesday.

Comment #129 - Posted by: Jim D. at August 17, 2007 11:19 AM

40yof

As rx'd but back extensions done on Swiss ball.
26:05

Just over a minute slower than last time (24:45), but then I was hurting all over from Murph yesterday, it was a wonder I got through it at all!

Comment #130 - Posted by: Cal Jones at August 17, 2007 11:21 AM

26:37 with decline situps. Smallpox vaccine is making me feel like poop.

Comment #131 - Posted by: john at August 17, 2007 11:22 AM

cchpie 116

Thanks for the info. And I'm gonna go ahead and agree with you in saying that I was not welcome on that site. On the flipside, I'm glad Crossfit doesn't require elite athleticism cuz I was nowhere near that level when I first started. To the entire Crossfit community, you guys are awesome.

Comment #132 - Posted by: Kurt at August 17, 2007 11:25 AM

As Rx'ed
17:07

#10
if you are having doughts just go! and leave the real workouts to those that appreciate them.

Comment #133 - Posted by: Christian at August 17, 2007 11:25 AM

18:22

BE on swiss ball, so not as much ROM as I would like and that cut a smidge of time. Sit ups on ground - regular.

Comment #134 - Posted by: Joel at August 17, 2007 11:26 AM

Thoughts on Janice #10 have surfaced at #104...

Comment #135 - Posted by: bingo at August 17, 2007 11:27 AM

32 yom 210#
CFWU x 3 (sans back extensions and situps)
As RX'd 27:34

Comment #136 - Posted by: TWK at August 17, 2007 11:30 AM

trying to hang in there
ab ball sit ups
good mornings

32:16

5'7 185

Comment #137 - Posted by: shawn at August 17, 2007 11:34 AM

#102 edevine-
Keep us posted about the baby arrival.
It's a veritable baby boom around here, must be something in the Kool Aid! :)

Kate

Comment #138 - Posted by: jknl at August 17, 2007 11:36 AM

15:21 as rx'd

GHD ext's, anchored sit ups

bwt-159
33yom
CFT-942

Comment #139 - Posted by: OPT at August 17, 2007 11:41 AM

as RX'd, 28:35...

again, i am indeed a relative newcomer, so still adjusting to the constant intensity. nevertheless, pleased with my early returns, especially in the 400s and 800s...

as far as the mark twight/gymjones discussion is concerned, i actually was aware of the entire "fallout" and controversy - i had looked into when i first began to consider a different fitness program as an alternative to traditional gym fare. obviously, i chose crossfit over gymjones, so i am certainly not suggesting that we all jump ship. however, i still check the gymjones site occasionally to see what they've been up to, and some of their routines look challenging and enjoyable...

on the notion of the WODs as entertainment, no, i don't believe they should necessarily be fun, and i understand the need for coach to provide a routine on this site that most CFers can perform (equipment wise). though i do believe that a routine must hold the athlete's attention - if these WODs are not doing it for janice, then perhaps she is not ready for them, as others have suggested.

finally, i do think it is interesting that in my original post, #78, i (despite being a newbie) suggested that we may be in a cycle emphasizing higher rep bodyweight exercises and more running as opposed to more high-load olympic movements; yet, the only responses to it focused on the twight comments. this seemed to prove my point that he has become a pariah rather than an alternative/offshoot/someone who simply has tweaked what he learned to fit his goals. and THAT was my point.

once again, i truly appreciate the thoughtful discussions on these topics and all things crossfit.

Comment #140 - Posted by: esteban at August 17, 2007 11:46 AM

General question:
How are most of you measuring your 800 meters? I'm trying to figure where I'm losing time. I drove my car around a couple of blocks, and it was .5 miles on the money. That's the same as running 2 laps around a track no? Are most of you guys busting out all 50 extensions with no stops? Same with the situps? I damn sure can't do that yet. I rigged up a back extension, and it was a little awkward getting off and on. My run times were 3:00, 3:15, 3:30, or close to that. I'm seeing run times fairly close to mine, so I'm guessing it's just muscular stamina that I need to work on. I felt like I pushed pretty hard to finish. Been doing this for about 3 weeks.

Comment #141 - Posted by: Tim Hamilton at August 17, 2007 11:48 AM

#104 bingo,
Brilliant. Few have the patience to deliver a rational explanation and rebuttal without crossing that fine line, and falling into sarcasm, myself included. You consistently do so, even aware that the individual is probably a troll. Thank you. You help maintain what I believe is CF's good name.

#136 Kate,
Will do. I can't wait to see how I handle 2 kids and WOD's. Hopefully like everyone else: 3,2,1...Go.

Comment #142 - Posted by: edevine at August 17, 2007 11:51 AM

28 yom 220#
As rx'd 24:15

Comment #143 - Posted by: Kuna at August 17, 2007 11:53 AM

34m/5-10/165
as RX'd
27:49

Comment #144 - Posted by: blackak at August 17, 2007 11:56 AM

18:42 PB (last time 21:53)
used 45 degree back ext., ran outside
felt good! need to be faster on runs if i want to beat time (sit up's/back ext unbroken).

Comment #145 - Posted by: OPT Mommy at August 17, 2007 11:57 AM

20:41
Good mornings with bar
Unanchored sit-ups

Comment #146 - Posted by: chris l at August 17, 2007 12:00 PM

21:21 pb with ghd back extensions and anchored sit ups. first round everything straight through and approximately 3:30 run, unfortunately I had to break up the back extensions on rounds 2 and 3 and that slowed me down.

Comment #147 - Posted by: Intent at August 17, 2007 12:05 PM

As RX'd. 21:12.

Comment #148 - Posted by: Jonas Cronfeld at August 17, 2007 12:12 PM

m60/186/6'1"
CFWU, then did "Michael" with the "Pack" 3 rds 800/35/35
25:20

Comment #149 - Posted by: PeteAK at August 17, 2007 12:21 PM

As Rx'ed 22:38

Had a partner today too.. Jim 24:03

Comment #150 - Posted by: B.O.S.S. at August 17, 2007 12:22 PM

Did half a Michael...slow getting the kids out the door today and it was the first day of school...1/4 mile runs, 25 good mornings, and 25 situps...time: 16:02

Comment #151 - Posted by: layman at August 17, 2007 12:28 PM

Let me first start off by stating that my legs and Glutes feel as if someone hit me in them w/a bat every hour on the hour last night... Murph was rough yesterday.

CFWU x3 (1/2 Sit-ups & Back Xt's)

WOD
:24::08

:04 slower then last time. My body is still wrecked from Murph. Going to bed at 0100 last night surely didn't help either. Runs done on a treadmill. Beer drinking will be done on a bar stool.

Get some, Go again!

Comment #152 - Posted by: DJ at August 17, 2007 12:33 PM

M/36/214 lbs

Still pissed at myself for only leaving enough time to do 45% of Murph yesterday before work, so...

Did today's WOD as Rx'd

run 800 m = 4:40
30+20 back extensions
20+20+10 sit ups on backless decline bench
run 800 m = 5:05
10/10 back ext./sit ups
run 800 m = 4:35
10/10 back ext./sit ups

total time 35:35

THEN did 17% more of Murph

7 sets of 5 pull ups/9 push ups/12 squats

I will try to chip away at more tomorrow and the rest day. I know its not a true Murph but at least I will have done the Rx'd work at the end of the week.

As far as the Gym Jones thing -- the WODs this week have taught me the value of mental toughness that comes with high reps. Being a sports injury therapist, I can tell you that evoking tissue change requires repetition - remodelling is a slow process -- but tissues remodel along the lines of stress/use placed upon them. 3 sets of 10 reps just doesn't cut it.

Comment #153 - Posted by: jnw at August 17, 2007 12:40 PM

20::52
runs on treadmill no incline. legs felt heavy but felt great to be in an ice cold gym.
glute ham sit ups were a little weak. they are still wrecked from 150 Lpulls

Comment #154 - Posted by: BONE at August 17, 2007 12:41 PM

Sorry #152 should say

10/10 x 5 back ext./sit ups

Comment #155 - Posted by: jnw at August 17, 2007 12:41 PM

42yom / 147

CFWU x3 x15 (-BE, Situps)
WOD - Michael - As RX'd
800 on treadmill 1% grade
50 back ext
50 situps (Floor feet anchored)

Time 19:49(PR) (shaved another 3 plus minutes off my previous PR)

Definately could have gone faster but much to my surprise there were actually 3 CF'ers doing the same WOD at the same time including me. The problem was in the Globo Gym that I go to there are only 2 back extension machines so it made for some shifting and waiting time. Excellent to meet additional CF'ers. Great work Mike and Matt keep it up.

Comment #156 - Posted by: mhlane at August 17, 2007 12:42 PM

Subbed 100 super-mans and 100 un-anchored crossover situps.

21:46

Knocked almost 5 minutes off my last "Michael" in May. Felt on the verge of a heart-attack the entire time. That's a good thing, right?
At the old Oxnard high school.

Comment #157 - Posted by: mas at August 17, 2007 12:46 PM

116 cch

Having lurked for a long time at Crossfit, I took a look at the GymJones stuff. Wow. It could be summed up fairly quickly by saying, "Don't even think about wasting our time." While sometimes the approach at CF may be blunt, you always sense a desire to impart knowledge on those seeking it.

Waiting for some strained hip flexors to settle down, and then it's back into it.

Comment #158 - Posted by: ChubbyD at August 17, 2007 12:49 PM

36/M/65kg

Meniscus bad, but I can run uphill just fine so I'm sticking to that.
5 rds of
Hill Sprint/Walk Down
30 Supermans
30 Sit-ups

17:10

Last 2 sprints very hard on the old ticker. Note; Last time I did Michael I had 16:41

Comment #159 - Posted by: mrjling at August 17, 2007 12:57 PM

20 min
Note: Used Treadmill for 800 speed 8.5 for first 2 (about 3:25) and 10 (about 3:00) for last 800m. Situps...OUCH...after last couple days.

Comment #160 - Posted by: StagSully at August 17, 2007 1:00 PM

18:25

Comment #161 - Posted by: F.B.C at August 17, 2007 1:00 PM

bingo- very well said.

OPT mommy- great job on the PR!

scheduled rest day for me. Hope to make this up tomorrow. my abs are still so sore from monday, which surprised me as i do abs post workout everyday. anyway, sneezing is very painful!

Comment #162 - Posted by: nadia shatila at August 17, 2007 1:01 PM

24:23

at fire station, so no GHD
unanchored situps, TM at 1%

Comment #163 - Posted by: ut steve at August 17, 2007 1:07 PM

46 / 177

as rx'd

22:28 -- off PR by :24 seconds. Wanted it. Could see it, then I fell apart halfway thru the third run. Sorry Lt McGreevy. Thank you for your sacrifice.

Comment #164 - Posted by: tom perry at August 17, 2007 1:09 PM

warmup stretching range of motion stuff

24minutes run improving

legs are done next time 20 minutes maybe...22minutes is more realistic

Comment #165 - Posted by: Angelo 36/250/xfit feb '07 at August 17, 2007 1:10 PM

32:36 - GHD BE and SU

Comment #166 - Posted by: dan colson at August 17, 2007 1:11 PM

Completed it!
Regular Military Sit-ups
Good Mornings for back extension
23:15

Felt great

Comment #167 - Posted by: Hoot at August 17, 2007 1:13 PM

subbed good mornings with 45lb bar
anchored feet

19:02

Comment #168 - Posted by: Kevin McClellan at August 17, 2007 1:31 PM

26M
150

17:30

Murph yesterday morning, jiu-jitsu last night, overhaul for 4 hours this morning, now Michael this afternoon. I am whipped.

Comment #169 - Posted by: Sean at August 17, 2007 1:33 PM

M/27/165

25:01 as rx'd

Comment #170 - Posted by: KSC at August 17, 2007 1:38 PM

21:40 (PR) using treadmill (9.0, 8.8, 8.5)

Comment #171 - Posted by: Hari at August 17, 2007 1:40 PM

Used decline bench
Time= 22:32

Prior: 20:04 but stuck to mainly crunches

So: don’t know it this is better or not
Erin

Comment #172 - Posted by: in8girl at August 17, 2007 1:45 PM

M/30/196

WOD: Time 25:57
subbed supermans for back extensions - no GHD machine in the gym...sit-ups were foot supported.

Post - L-pull-up practice 3x max (~5 each set). ow.
Bench 5x5 - 135/155/175/185/195

Stretch

Comment #173 - Posted by: CJOH at August 17, 2007 1:45 PM

This was definitely easier on paper than it was to execute. Nonetheless I finished only a few situps short of the prescribed routine.
For me the most valuable aspect of crossfit is the motivation that reading these posts provides. Everytime I think of shortcutting the WOD I think about what a pansy I would be compared to all those that complete it.

Comment #174 - Posted by: Vincent at August 17, 2007 1:59 PM

WU: 1000m row (4:29.5)

1000m row (3:48.3)
50 Abmat situps (Unbroken)
50 Back extensions (GHD 25-15-10) (9:25)
1000m row (3:54.5)
50 Abmat situps (Unbroken)
50 Back extensions (GHD 25-15-10) (19:22)
1000m row (3:57.5)
50 Abmat situps (Unbroken)
50 Back extensions (GHD 25-15-10) (29:30)

Comment #175 - Posted by: Boxer4 at August 17, 2007 2:03 PM

20:48

back extensions on swiss ball, sit ups anchored.

lower back still anchored to swiss ball.

Comment #176 - Posted by: ltp at August 17, 2007 2:06 PM

Subbed row 800m for run
Back extension
Situps on decline bench

A trainer interrupted me right before 2nd round, so that gave me some extra rest (stopped timer for the little chat)

Time - 22:28

Comment #177 - Posted by: Davis at August 17, 2007 2:08 PM

#161 nadia

I couldn't agree more. I thought the people at gymjones were pissed at me just for logging on to their site...

ANYWAYS

18/m/162
"Michael"

16:30 PR

I haven't clocked Michael for at least 6 months but I know it was well over 20 minutes. All sets unbroken and I can feel myself getting a higher pain tolerance during sprints.

Comment #178 - Posted by: Kurt at August 17, 2007 2:09 PM

As RX'd
My crew and I finished under 20 minutes.

Comment #179 - Posted by: Brad at August 17, 2007 2:10 PM

165/m/36

subbed 1,000m row 33'12 (PR)
row splits
3'43 254w PR 1.54
4'14 172w PR 1.04
4'13 174w PR 1.05

Comment #180 - Posted by: epicurius at August 17, 2007 2:11 PM

198/m/27

As rx'ed
24:06

9:32 better than last time in May. Wahoo!

Comment #181 - Posted by: Jim W at August 17, 2007 2:15 PM

The PR in the row splits is for Power Ratio the (PR) after the time is personal record.

Comment #182 - Posted by: epicurius at August 17, 2007 2:16 PM

41/185/6'

First, here is my prediction: The WOD day for tomorrow will be "JT".

WOD as Rx'd 18:45 with GHSU.

Comment #183 - Posted by: SDG at August 17, 2007 2:17 PM

31 yom, 5'11/175
burgener w/u x 3
As rx'd 22:45 ... slowly getting there

Comment #184 - Posted by: Evil Huey at August 17, 2007 2:18 PM

23/m/170

Runs on TM at 1% incline, avg. of 9.0 mph on the 3 runs

Did the GH sit-ups on the back extension device, just flipped my body over. Accidentally did the sit-ups before the back extensions in the cycle, though.

Overall time = 28:49

Comment #185 - Posted by: Dover at August 17, 2007 2:22 PM

As a beginning crossfitter I did the best I could do.
22/m/185
Ran treadmill 0% incline avg 9.0
50 pullups and finished the rest on lat pulldown
125 PU
200 squats

35:15

almost met pukie.

Comment #186 - Posted by: Warren at August 17, 2007 2:45 PM

And i did the completely wrong workout...

Comment #187 - Posted by: warren at August 17, 2007 2:47 PM

170#/M

as rx'd
17:54

Comment #188 - Posted by: brad at August 17, 2007 2:49 PM

#70 Maximus you wrote:

Do ALL of the workouts on a 3-on 1-off schedule (follow the national WOD) with the following caveat:
every 4th week is to be done at 1/2 volume
every 12th week is to taken COMPLETLEY off (jogging, biking, etc. allowed, no intense excercise).


Just curious where your rational for the rest periods is derived from? If this is somewhere on the site could you please point me to the location?

I have noticed many posts where folks are doing !/2 WOD’s and or taking a week or two off and am curious where this ideology comes from.

I am under the impression that the 3 on / 1 off provides sufficient rest and is planned as part of the Crossfit régime.

Just curious, no bashing intended…

Wayne.

Comment #189 - Posted by: wtp at August 17, 2007 2:49 PM

Bingo - Your true colors show through . . . namely, that you are a kind, thoughtful man (and handsome, too, I'm certain). You never fail to say it just right (as edevine noted).

Kate - glad to see you working out and that your heart is holding up. Hope you and yours are well.

Will try to get this one in, but very busy lately with jujitsu and starting a semi-solo practice as I leave active duty.

A CF affiliate may be in the offing...

esteban (at 78 and 139) - I'll try to address your points, although I think darrell already did.
1 - I can question Mark Twight's "imagination ... and fitness". The imagination part has already been conclusively disproven by Coach. The people who take issue with this always seem to be those newcomeres who are somehow in awe of Mr. Twight. Great alpinist? I don't know (I'd concede, but I don't know enough abot that community to really make a judgment.) But as we define fitness here (see the CF Journal "What is Fitness"), I'm not so sure. To wit...

2 - From his site: In 2007, placed 44th (of 82 in his field) in the Bob Cook Memorial Mt. Evans Hill Climb. 23rd (of 64) in the High Uintas Classic from Kamas Utah to Evanston, Wyoming. 34th (of a field of 115 racers in the 45-49 age group) in the Iron Horse Bicycle Classic road race from Durango to Silverton, CO. 23rd (of a field of 43 Cat 4 racers) in the East Canyon road race. Also - his stats (from GymJones)
Deadlift: 365#
Clean & Jerk: 165#
Snatch: 115#
Overhead Squat: 155#
Front Squat: 205#
Pull-Ups: 40
Weighted Pull-Ups: +106#

Now, I'm no legend and I've been coming to CF for almost 2 years now, but my numbers in all of those lifts/categories are better. Much better. And I am no "beast" by CF standards of fitness.

Now, esteban, let me make something clear - I'm not bagging on Mark Twight. He may be a great guy - I don't know. There's evidence to suggest otherwise, but hey, I've never met the guy.

But your claim of his athletic prowess (your word was "a beast") doesn't stand up to what I've seen of true "Beasts" at CF workouts and affiliates. Josh E. is a beast. I've seen it live and up close. Greg A - Beasty beast. Seen vidclips - dude's an axe. Seen Brendan up close on a few occasions and he puts out like you would not believe - I thought once he might die at the end of a workout - seriously. I stayed close to him just in case. AFT and OPT? You have to actually see it in person to believe it. Chris Spealler? Animal. Nicole, Annie, and Eva T? Nice.

So, I appreciate your "opinion", but that is just what it is and nothing more. The facts do not support what you say.

But if people want to go over there and play with Mark's workouts, great. Good for them. Me? I'll keep coming here, even if it's not as "entertaining" as it otherwise could be.

Peace.

Comment #190 - Posted by: Dale Saran at August 17, 2007 2:53 PM

Wayne - a number of people have posted about this on the boards. Maybe empirical, maybe anecdotal. A number of people have found that after a while, the body starts to tire a bit from the intensity and a little throttle back may be necessary. I myself try to stick to 3/1 and find that life gets sufficiently in the way every so often that it enforces physical rest through work, children, travel, etc.

Comment #191 - Posted by: Dale Saran at August 17, 2007 2:56 PM

35/175

21:57 as rx'd

Comment #192 - Posted by: lawman698 at August 17, 2007 2:56 PM

29yo M 170lb 5’10”
CFWU x 3, 3 pull ups, 3 ring dips, 3 negative HSPU per round. Jog 750M, stretch.

Run 800 meters: 1-1-1
50 Back Extensions: 50-50-50
50 Sit-ups: 50-50-50
Time: 30:37
Foam roll after

Compared to 070522: 33:49

Comment #193 - Posted by: Sesoku at August 17, 2007 3:02 PM

38/200

22:42

Comment #194 - Posted by: Brady Conger at August 17, 2007 3:03 PM

37:02

GHD Situps.

No more abs please. :P

Comment #195 - Posted by: PL at August 17, 2007 3:05 PM

subbed 1K rows
50 back xt.
50 AbMat situps (unanchored)

27:20
Mike Donnelly

Comment #196 - Posted by: rosceaux at August 17, 2007 3:08 PM

Wayne wtp #188:

Larry Lindeman is one of the original CF legends. He has found that CF'ers who push the intensity envelope each and every WOD start to plateau and then burn out. He developed the schedule you reference and many people actively follow it. If life has not intervened, or if I don't have a business trip that falls conveniently, I try to take 5 or 6 consecutive days off every 3 months. I find that I have enough unplanned off days that the 1/2 intensity week is rarely needed for me. YRMV.

Dale, I blush...

Comment #197 - Posted by: bingo at August 17, 2007 3:09 PM

Theresa 26:00
Mark 24:36.

Comment #198 - Posted by: Theresa & Mark at August 17, 2007 3:09 PM

37 yom
as rx'd
19:20

Comment #199 - Posted by: chrisb at August 17, 2007 3:13 PM

19:56

pr by 1:39

Comment #200 - Posted by: domer at August 17, 2007 3:14 PM

42/m/182

As rx'd

32:05

Comment #201 - Posted by: Pickle at August 17, 2007 3:23 PM

33M / 185# / WOD #161 / CFT 825

CFWU, then "Michael"

Three rounds for time of:
Run 800 meters (over the Big Hill)
50 Back Extensions (stability ball)
50 Sit-ups (butterfly ABMAT)

25:30

Comment #202 - Posted by: wilson at August 17, 2007 3:25 PM

24/M/180

22.48 as rx'd. Ran on a treadmill and did back ext. off the back of a leg press machine... worked surprisingly well!

Comment #203 - Posted by: gcote at August 17, 2007 3:26 PM

42y/175#/5'10"/m

.5 mile run (nice hot Louisiana day)
50 back extensions
50 sit ups

x1 = 9:55
x2 = 19:45 (total elapsed time)
x3 = 32:57 (Done!)


Yee Haa!

Comment #204 - Posted by: OSV at August 17, 2007 3:31 PM

M/25/208#

Another great workout honoring a real American Warrior.

24m 50s
did swiss ball back extensions

Comment #205 - Posted by: NO at August 17, 2007 3:36 PM

does anybody still post there informaion? Or has this become a chat room?

Comment #206 - Posted by: Kali-sta at August 17, 2007 3:40 PM

Neil(50) & Ellie(52)

Neil

Lap 1
OHS X 95 lbs X 21
Pull ups X 12
Step ups 14" box X 100

Lap 2
OHS X 95 lbs X 12
Pull ups X 21
Step ups X 100

Lap 3
OHS X 95 lbs X 21
Pull ups X 12
Step ups X 100

Time 23.48

Ellie

As above except OHS X 15 lb bar

Time 27.15

Have a good one.

Neilfit

PS. Will try to fit in a "Michael" in sometime this weekend.

Comment #207 - Posted by: Neilfit at August 17, 2007 3:40 PM

M/33/5'9/168#/CFT=870
Subbed an 8.55mi run up to the Continental Divide from Loveland ski area in 135min to prepare for a Labor Day trail race.

Comment #208 - Posted by: Denver Sheepdog at August 17, 2007 3:42 PM

m/38/174/67"

as rx'd

26:18

Ran on a mill

Sit ups were on a sit up board w/feet raised about 8" and braced.

Comment #209 - Posted by: Adam W at August 17, 2007 3:42 PM

As Rx'd
26:28

Comment #210 - Posted by: B. Rhaly at August 17, 2007 3:46 PM

#190 Dale
#196 Bingo

Thank you, makes sense.

I have been hitting it since the middle of Feb. I am now just starting to get times/posts that I can be somewhat proud of (Few) but improving. Kind of affraid to lay off a week or go to 1/2 WOD but if I feel that I am peeking then Maybe I will give pulling back a try.

Again thank you guys. By the way, I enjoy both of your regular posts.

Wayne.

Comment #211 - Posted by: wtp at August 17, 2007 3:49 PM

wod:

30 min of 20 24" box jump, 200' longline pull, 20 situps, 15 incline pushups

Comment #212 - Posted by: hazmat at August 17, 2007 3:54 PM

as rx'ed
26:48
2nd week in Colorado, 1st week on WOD's

Comment #213 - Posted by: Matt at August 17, 2007 4:01 PM

m/37/188/69"
runs was on the mill at 1%
27:36

Comment #214 - Posted by: nink60mm at August 17, 2007 4:07 PM

30s instead of 50s

p - 20:20

K - 24:00

Comment #215 - Posted by: mufasa at August 17, 2007 4:08 PM

41/167

800s
Supermans
unanchored sit-ups

Time 30.41

About 3 minutes slower than last time. All exercises completed outside, ninety-two degrees here in north Texas.

Comment #216 - Posted by: Rick at August 17, 2007 4:08 PM

#205
It depends on your browser, using firefox, I don't see any URL / Email links, but opening Internet Explorer, they come up. I don't know if that's the answer you were looking for... but hope it helps.

Comment #217 - Posted by: Janell at August 17, 2007 4:10 PM

20:54
sit-ups anchored, used arms for momentum when fatigued

Comment #218 - Posted by: Steve N. at August 17, 2007 4:10 PM

17:48 as rx'ed, feet unanchored. New PB by one full minute.

All reps straight through, runs decent but could be better; the last run felt the looser of the three which could be due to Murph yesterday or a fast warm-up due to baby time constraints. Finally a time worth dedicating to my baby boy, Brogan. Love you, buddy.

Comment #219 - Posted by: gaucoin at August 17, 2007 4:10 PM

M/28/170
As Rx'd 24:01

Tim #140
The car method works, but if you want another way to measure check out this link from a previous comment post. I think it works great and as best I can tell, really accurate.
http://www.gmap-pedometer.com

Comment #220 - Posted by: Brian at August 17, 2007 4:13 PM

m/34/150

as Rx'd 21:03

runs on treadmill at 1% at 10, 9.5, 9.5 mph

Comment #221 - Posted by: the TODD at August 17, 2007 4:13 PM

Has to do with how you open the comments screen with FF. If it comes as it's own screen in FF, all the links come up. If you have the actual day opened up from the main page, the links don't work.

Tim #140 - download Google Earth (http://earth.google.com). You'll have some fun mapping out new trails. Use the ruler and path tool to figure distances, and it does standard as well as metric so it is easy to figure out a 5k route as well as miles.

Comment #222 - Posted by: Angry G at August 17, 2007 4:16 PM

30 / M / 155 / CFT 695

26:35 with 15 pound weight vest (about 10% of bodyweight)

Comment #223 - Posted by: masterpayne_MIAMI at August 17, 2007 4:17 PM

33 y/o male
23:00
treadmill- 1%incline
GHM first 25
Knees-2-Elbows 25
back extension as rx'd

Comment #224 - Posted by: Fish at August 17, 2007 4:19 PM

Did at Xtreme, as it is tough to find a back extension close to someplace to run around here.
29:38 -- run .5miles on treadmill at 1%
Thought I did really well until I saw the other times.

Comment #225 - Posted by: Garth at August 17, 2007 4:23 PM

26m/6'5"/215

22:02

subbed Good-mornings for the BEs

Comment #226 - Posted by: samsterdam at August 17, 2007 4:24 PM

Michael as rx'd
20:27
treadmill runs, 1%, 10, 10.1, 10.2

Comment #227 - Posted by: BEER90 at August 17, 2007 4:26 PM

20:55. Unachored situps on Abmat, good mornings for back extensions.

Comment #228 - Posted by: Norma at August 17, 2007 4:31 PM

26yom/175

Sit-Ups/Back extensions on GHD. 23:03.

This workout always looks easier on paper.

Comment #229 - Posted by: Svor at August 17, 2007 4:35 PM

m/45/185

as Rx'd, 25:16 - GHD situps done to parallel, sub "good mornings" for back extensions.

on the other hand, my 8 year old son did the same workout, waiting for Dad, and finished in 22:00 without even breaking a sweat.

Not fair.

Comment #230 - Posted by: TomF at August 17, 2007 4:38 PM

Scaled to 3 rounds of:

600 m run
15 unweighted good-mornings
25 sit-ups

20:44.

I feel like those unweighted good-mornings aren't doing me a lick of good. They never feel difficult. Supermans are better, but nothing beats the GHD back extension. I hate to lose time running up and down the stairs between the treadmills and the weight room, though.

Comment #231 - Posted by: kpm at August 17, 2007 4:41 PM

Neil 25:21
James: 25:29

45deg Roman chair and the situps were more like crunches.

Comment #232 - Posted by: Team Lakeland at August 17, 2007 4:44 PM

22m/5'4/165

28:00.

Comment #233 - Posted by: Frank at August 17, 2007 4:45 PM

27 min flat

Comment #234 - Posted by: Matt Hodges at August 17, 2007 4:53 PM

19 m bw 178

3 rnds for time

1000m row
35 anchored situps
35 back extensions on 45 degree angle extension machine

20:30

Comment #235 - Posted by: Linguini at August 17, 2007 4:57 PM

as Rx'd
30:11
My first crossfit workout.. trying something new :P

Comment #236 - Posted by: Rob F. at August 17, 2007 5:01 PM

25/f/128#

scale indicates a lil dehydration maybe..... ankle bugs a lil bit. sore. rotation not so comfy.

breakfast: run 35 mins = 4.53 miles

WOD:
runs on treadmill
50 ghd sit-ups
50 back extensions

26 mins

.... had to wait a bit for the seated calf-raise thingie to use for GHD sit-ups. same time as last Michael, but that one wuz done sans righteous d.o.m.s. (especially da abs!) and sans GHD (inclined sit-ups). man, i thought my tummy muscles were gonna rip open on the first set of sit-ups! haha, good stuff.

worked hard = good work - keep it up CFers!!

Comment #237 - Posted by: cleverhandz at August 17, 2007 5:03 PM

26/m/170

subbed good mornings for back extensions

28:58

Comment #238 - Posted by: Jarod at August 17, 2007 5:04 PM

27.00

Comment #239 - Posted by: Wade at August 17, 2007 5:07 PM

25/M/170lbs

As RX'd.

800M on treadmill.
GHD Situps and Back extensions.

33:51.

I am very cautious with my GHD sit-ups. I've had some very intense ab soreness from these, and I've heard a few horror stories of "overdoing" it on these. This may have slowed me down, coupled with running across the gym from treadmill to GHD. That, and wiping up my puddles of sweat on everything I touched.

Comment #240 - Posted by: Gonzo at August 17, 2007 5:12 PM

26 yom 6'2" 155#

As rx'd

21:26....first Michael

Comment #241 - Posted by: Skeletor at August 17, 2007 5:13 PM

28/f/154#

Brand X pack - 3 rounds of 800m run, 35 supermans, 35 sit-ups

Time - 25:00. All runs unbroken. Calisthenics were broken 25/10 for rounds 1 and 2 and done continuously for round 3.

070522 - I attempted the same volume, managed less than half the sit-ups due to an ab strain, and finished in the same time.

Comment #242 - Posted by: Rydain at August 17, 2007 5:14 PM

First Michael. 24:53. Subbed superman's for back ext and crunches for sit-ups. I ran kinda slow though, my sacroiliac was acting up.

Comment #243 - Posted by: Nick M at August 17, 2007 5:14 PM

"Michael" as Rx'd 27:42
On Duty today so run was on treadmill(I do not like the treadmill said sam I am!).

Plus

Cable upright rows 4x6 40;60;80;70
Alt. d.b. curls 4x6 30;35;40;45
5min d.b. shoulder press w/ 20lb d.b. Switch hands at 2 1/2min. R107/L92.
Guess I gotta' work on that left shoulder.
Recurring tenderness in left shoulder. Seems to weaken everything on that side.
Almost met Mr. Pukie today!

Comment #244 - Posted by: will at August 17, 2007 5:27 PM

Anthony (BW=180)
Notes: subbed good mornings for back ext
Time: 26:24

Jodi (BW=104)
Notes: subbed good mornings for back ext
Time: 24:15

Mapped out a new route with a few hills ... changes things quite a bit!

Comment #245 - Posted by: Anthony Bainbridge & Jodi Arbeau at August 17, 2007 5:40 PM

as RX'd
32:48

Still a bit sore from Murph yesterday. Feels great!

Comment #246 - Posted by: James at August 17, 2007 5:42 PM

34:40
abs STILL trashed from monday's wod.

Comment #247 - Posted by: shark at August 17, 2007 5:48 PM

50/165
as rx'd sit ups with ab mat
25:16

Mrs.L/49
3x 800meters,35 back ext,35 sit up
31:21

Comment #248 - Posted by: lobo at August 17, 2007 5:50 PM

41yo/f/165#
swam 1500yds
1 round 11:36...wondered why my time was so fast...neglected to do the other 2 rounds!

Comment #249 - Posted by: lisaq at August 17, 2007 5:54 PM

#140 - Tim

You don't make your time by running fast on these types of workout. I ran all of these over 9 MPH (10, then 9.5, then 9) and my time is a lot slower than may posted. It is the breaks I have to take. I can crank out the extensions without much rest, but I have to rest more on the situps. I also think being tall (6'5") makes back extensions, squats, pullups and such slightly slower. No matter how much explosion I have, I have to go down lower and up further and it just takes more time. I don't know how tall you are, but I think it really does start to add up when you are doing high rep work.

Comment #250 - Posted by: Corey at August 17, 2007 5:57 PM

24:56

Comment #251 - Posted by: Jay M at August 17, 2007 5:57 PM

33yo M 195lb

general stretch as warm-up.

as RX: 2254

was informed earlier this week FD I work for aproved funding to send me to Cert. Seminar in Mesa AZ in Oct. I am going to be more "by the book" as far as WOD and posting. Thanks for all the questions everyone always asks because on more than a handful of occasions I have had the same or almost the same question. Keep up the good work everyone!!

Comment #252 - Posted by: BCastillo at August 17, 2007 5:59 PM

32M185

21:45

Comment #253 - Posted by: zag at August 17, 2007 6:00 PM

33yo male 195lb.

2254 as RX.

informed FD will send me to Cert in Mesa AZ in OCT. I plan to be more steadfast with RX'd WOD and posting times. thanks everyone for all the post and questions because more than once I have had the same question. Keep up the good work.

Comment #254 - Posted by: BCastillo at August 17, 2007 6:01 PM

21:33... wanted to break 21 but took a little too much break time

Comment #255 - Posted by: Jon L at August 17, 2007 6:05 PM

sub'd squats for back extensions due to lack of equipment and the fact that my brother and I are gluttons for punishment.

chris: 28:30
nolan: 18:07

Comment #256 - Posted by: Nolan at August 17, 2007 6:05 PM

Article today in the Tulsa World - Tulsa,OK,USA.

Great to see CrossFit sweeping the nation. I use the google alert feature to read these articles and they are always positive and great.

Spread the word.

Comment #257 - Posted by: StagSully at August 17, 2007 6:13 PM

"Michael"

Three rounds for time of: 32min 27sec
Run 800 meters
50 Back Extensions
50 Sit-ups

1min slower this time.
My lower back took one hell of a punishment

Comment #258 - Posted by: Eddie Laubengeyer at August 17, 2007 6:15 PM

20:53
w/ 20lbs weight vest

Comment #259 - Posted by: chris merz at August 17, 2007 6:17 PM

23/M/162
As Rx'ed
39:09.41'

Comment #260 - Posted by: Fredastere at August 17, 2007 6:20 PM

M/181#/37yoa

24:22

Comment #261 - Posted by: rob miller CFSC at August 17, 2007 6:21 PM

Been on leave for the last week and only got two WODs done, but I DID get engaged to my CrossFittin' girlfriend. Life is good. NOW BACK TO THE GYM!!

Comment #262 - Posted by: ProPain at August 17, 2007 6:23 PM

I'm a day behind. Did Murph today.

Comment #263 - Posted by: Grund at August 17, 2007 6:33 PM

This was my first day back on Crossfit in nearly a year. I remember doing this workout and feeling pretty good about it. Not today. Started on full reps but rapidly scaled back for a 21:09 finish.

Ugh. Can hardly wait for more.

Comment #264 - Posted by: Kevin at August 17, 2007 6:36 PM

If you are on here and think that CrossFit is only for the "elite", check this out from Austin, TX. Pretty good video...

http://news8austin.com/shared/video/video_pop.asp?destlist=45329

Comment #265 - Posted by: ProPain at August 17, 2007 6:38 PM

I halfed everything.

3 rounds of:

Run 400 meters
25 back extension
25 sit-ups

34:56

I'm sure that doing this workout at 5am, after not getting alot of sleep impacted my time negatively a bit.

Comment #266 - Posted by: Beau B. at August 17, 2007 7:04 PM

27/M/224

modified CFWU + WOD

40mins 10secs

did work out too late ( started at 20:30 )but add 25mins walking from home to gym and reverse.

Comment #267 - Posted by: David at August 17, 2007 7:06 PM

"Michael"
as Rx'd:
Cory- 26:10 (pr by 0:05)
Lydia- 32:01
Lana- 29:58 (inclined back extensions)
Maxim- 23:38 (inclined back extensions)

Oh yeah, and Maxim is only 8 years old.

Comment #268 - Posted by: CBR Chitown at August 17, 2007 7:12 PM

Way to go #97!

My situps were pretty poor, but did make it thru the entire WOD!

36 min. and I'll pay for it tomorrow I'm sure!

42/m/202

God Bless you Michael!

Comment #269 - Posted by: wyohawk at August 17, 2007 7:17 PM

#108 Congratulations on your first wk. Keep posting, it will help.

I left off at Jason and took a break due to tendinitis, but would'nt you know just happen to pick Murphy to come back...ouch.

43/160/M
Murphy 45:32
ran first mile in sand
50 PU
200 Sit Ups
200 Squates
last mile on road

Comment #270 - Posted by: Allen at August 17, 2007 7:22 PM

Just watched most of 300. Yeah most people in the movie were fit, but the movie itself sucked.

Comment #271 - Posted by: Paul Jones at August 17, 2007 7:32 PM

42 6' 210

26'35" pr

Comment #272 - Posted by: mtvet at August 17, 2007 7:40 PM

For a different kind of athletic performance - and pretty darn remarkable balance and coordination - take 2 minutes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCNahg3OjUs

Comment #273 - Posted by: annlee at August 17, 2007 7:45 PM

37m/185
CFWU x3 -back extensions
WOD as rx'd
partitioned BEs and SU into 20s and 10s
22 minutes (wall clock)
back extensions really hard for me (sad face)

Comment #274 - Posted by: dmic at August 17, 2007 7:46 PM