January 5, 2006

Thursday 060105

Push Jerk 3-3-3-2-2-2-1-1-1 reps

Post loads to comments.

cfDC-th.jpg

Enlarge image

CrossFit DC


We've had ropes and cargo nets fail at multiple CrossFit locations and the problem is endemic to Pacific Fibre and Rope's rigging. Rigging experts from West Marine, the U.S. Navy and Air Force have examined these products and been appalled at the substandard materials and workmanship.

On first announcing the defects (http://www.crossfit.com/mt-archive2/000613.html) we removed our link to Pacific Fibre and Rope, but unfortunately after rebuilding a crash of the CrossFit site the link reappeared because it had not been removed from backup files.

Get rid of your Pacific Fibre and Rope ladders, cargo nets, ropes, gangway nets, and other products.


A Unified Theory of Animal Locomotion from Duke University

Posted by lauren at January 5, 2006 5:43 PM
Comments

Be sure to check out the Crossfit DC video from the "Year Gone Bad" workout on the 12/31:

http://www.va-parkour.com/media/xfitdcygb.avi

The video is encoded with Divx, which is a free download: http://www.divx.com/divx/play/download/

Comment #1 - Posted by: Jesse Woody at January 4, 2006 5:52 PM

Crossfit,

Thank you so much for the great articles. I've printed out everything over the past several days. Happy New Years to you and everyone!

Go TEXAS!

Comment #2 - Posted by: Rob M. at January 4, 2006 5:52 PM

So then, according to the article, there is a unifying principle that links my C&J to an kangaroo's hop . . . . . . . ;-)

Comment #3 - Posted by: Clay Jones at January 4, 2006 6:02 PM

Coach and Lauren,

Thanks! You rock!

Comment #4 - Posted by: DJ at January 4, 2006 6:10 PM

Question:
After watching the exercise videos ...
do we go from behind the head or in front?
Also Coach B states that this is the second skill
transfer for the clean & Jerk. What is the first?

Coach & Lauren - thanks for the articles! You're not planning a baseline test on our reading assignments are you??

J

Comment #5 - Posted by: Jeff_Roddy at January 4, 2006 6:45 PM

2nd pic of the DC crew, 2nd time that bald guy shows up in a pic of them. Coincidence? I think not.

Comment #6 - Posted by: Adam C L at January 4, 2006 6:48 PM

If I were religious, I would say that this provides a link between God and Evolution. That is an amazing article.

Comment #7 - Posted by: brendan melville at January 4, 2006 6:58 PM

New to crossfit, and try to check out the FAQ and the videos when I don't know an exercise before asking. Just wondering if we might be able to add a link to the video of the exercise in the main page.
IOW on todays WOD where it says push jerk it could be blue and a clicky to the video.
I know lots of free work is put into the site already, just see lots of questions that might be answered this way.

Rich

Comment #8 - Posted by: RJF98 at January 4, 2006 7:46 PM

RFJ98,

Welcome, and double thanks for being a newbie with a perfectly sensible idea. Stick around and consider it done!

Comment #9 - Posted by: Coach at January 4, 2006 7:48 PM

How long of a break should we take between the sets on todays WOD? Thanks and keep the great work outs coming.

Comment #10 - Posted by: mayor at January 4, 2006 7:59 PM

WOW, you guys in the USA must have different libel and slander laws to australia! thats some good "feedback" re: pacific fibre ropes.

I guess if its saving lives your doingthe right thing!

PS: linda handed my ass to me the other day!

Comment #11 - Posted by: james at January 4, 2006 8:51 PM

What about Pacific Fibre’s rigging is unsafe? I've had the same climbing rope from them for three years. It's been outdoors and in the elements the entire time. I use it at least once a week and it's still going strong.

Comment #12 - Posted by: Ryan S at January 4, 2006 9:22 PM

Could someone give a brief description of the Push Jerk? I'm deployed in Fallujah, Iraq, and many file types, including video, are blocked by our firewall in order to conserve our bandwidth.

Thanks

Comment #13 - Posted by: bll at January 4, 2006 9:36 PM

Question regarding the push-jerk-
Should we be keeping our feet stationary like the slide, or jumping like the video? I apologize if it is a stupid question (still in my first real month of crossfit) as it is probably personal preferance but I just want to do them correctly.
thanks again
Ryan

Comment #14 - Posted by: ryan at January 4, 2006 9:48 PM

Bll,

A Push Jerk is where you do a shoulder press, but dip and power through with the legs. At the "top" you want to explode off the ground, moving your legs to move into a jerk position. (one forward, one back)

I hope that helps
and hope its and accurate description...

Comment #15 - Posted by: Steven N at January 4, 2006 10:10 PM

With regards to the "Unified Theory"
?Why do they put question marks both in front of and after a sentence? I've not seen that before.
It's an interesting article, and it seems to be common sense, related to the laws of physics, I guess someone needed to get it down on paper.

Comment #16 - Posted by: Jim Howe at January 4, 2006 10:14 PM

Somebody HELP!
I just downloaded DivX, but when I click on the video link my Quicktime software opens up and it says it can't download the video. What gives???

Comment #17 - Posted by: Alex at January 4, 2006 11:05 PM

OOPS!!
I realized I described the SPLIT JERK, not Push Jerk.

sorry...

Comment #18 - Posted by: Steven N at January 5, 2006 12:18 AM

Extra Fran for you, Steve.

Alex: Try downloading the video first. Ctrl-click on Mac or right click on Windows and "save as". Once you have it downloaded, right click it and "open with..." Your preferences are set to default to Quicktime. You can also change that in a preferences window somewhere.

Comment #19 - Posted by: Ed at January 5, 2006 2:06 AM

Hi all, first week of crossfit, new to all the lifts; 75 lb for all 3 rep sets; 85 lb 2 rep sets and 95 lb for 1 rep sets. Working on form.

Comment #20 - Posted by: Rich K at January 5, 2006 2:24 AM

Warmup: 45# bar x 10, 135x5
WOD:
3x155,165,175
2x185,190,195
1x200(f),200,200(f),195,200,205(f),205,210(f),210
bw:190

I began to figure out how to explode my power after my second successful attempt at 200. I got excited with the discovery of this new-found power and kept going beyond the 3 sets of 1.

Also, for the sets of 3,2 reps I cleaned the bar before the jerk.

Comment #21 - Posted by: DaveE at January 5, 2006 2:26 AM

FGB @ Crossfit DC what a great way to ring in the new year!

Comment #22 - Posted by: Allen Y at January 5, 2006 3:21 AM

From the ground up:
85, 105, 125
145, 165, 185
195, 205, 205

Comment #23 - Posted by: Tom O at January 5, 2006 3:34 AM

From the ground up:
85, 105, 125
145, 165, 185
195, 205, 205

Comment #24 - Posted by: Tom O at January 5, 2006 3:35 AM

3 x 60kg
2 x 62.5, 65, 67.5
1 x 70, 72.5, 75, 77.5, 80

Comment #25 - Posted by: adrian at January 5, 2006 3:45 AM

Ryan,

Dude - with your mouse, click on the link, with your eyes, look at the picture, with your imagination picture yourself in freefall. If you then don't see what's wrong with the rigging keep climbing.

For the rest of you: all the splices on all the rigging are unraveling, they are way too short, hidden by opaque shrink wrap, and the ropes are hung by carabiners not intended or designed for critical application - all of which was shocking to professional riggers.

I called Ron Goldman repeatedly about the rope's failures. Sent them all back (five ropes) at my expense. Called again. Never got a call back, refund, or heard peep. No surprise the customer service and accountability match the product quality.

Comment #26 - Posted by: Coach at January 5, 2006 3:53 AM

Is this one meant to be from a rack or from ground up-think i vvill try this from `ground up`- still recovering from linda -even though i managed only 5 rounds !!But i am up for it !!!Love this stuff!!

Comment #27 - Posted by: Ers. at January 5, 2006 4:13 AM

Here's what appears to be another good video of the Push Jerk taken from the side: http://www.uwlax.edu/strengthcenter/videos/JimTrav/Push%20Jerks.mpg

Comment #28 - Posted by: Russ T. at January 5, 2006 4:27 AM

3-45
3-55
3-65
2-75
2-85
2-90
1-95
1-100
1-105

Comment #29 - Posted by: Marissa Cullen at January 5, 2006 4:53 AM

There seems to be a link to Pacicfic Fibre left in the FAQ (Question 5.2). Thanks for the site, maybe I found something to get in shape again (although I would need something below "Buttercup" level to start with...).

Comment #30 - Posted by: Matt at January 5, 2006 5:05 AM

New Crossfit sub for Burpees: Climb a 2000 ft radio antenna. Wrestle a goat during your run home.

Comment #31 - Posted by: Mike Mueller at January 5, 2006 5:22 AM

Warm up: 3 circuits of 15 oh squats, 10 dips and 8 chins

then ptp deadlifts and military press - 150 kg and 55kg top weights respectively.

Then WOD:

135 x 3

155 x 2

165, 175, 185, 200, 205 x 1

225 x f - rushed this a bit as I was a) over confident and b) late for work.


will practice some technique later on this pm...

Comment #32 - Posted by: HC at January 5, 2006 5:23 AM

What should the rest period be between reps in today's WOD?

Comment #33 - Posted by: Steve at January 5, 2006 5:36 AM

Hello, new here. Thanks for the excellent website.
First WOD for me today. My technique looked sorry. Jumping while lifting felt awkward.

3-95
3-115
3-135
2-145
2-155
2-155
1-165
1-165
1-165

Comment #34 - Posted by: chris at January 5, 2006 5:36 AM

2 thoughts on reading the Unified Theory article:
1) when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
2) It hardly "explains" locomotion; in some fashion it attempts to quantify the end states, but I do not find placing boundaries and definitions on an existing process to be an "explanation."

Comment #35 - Posted by: Lynne Pitts at January 5, 2006 5:40 AM

3-65
3-85
3-95
2-115
2-115
2-115
1-125
1-125
1-125

Still trying to get comfortable doing these lifts. It'll be better the next time.

Comment #36 - Posted by: Nick at January 5, 2006 5:45 AM

I think I'm with you, Lynne. Another headline may have been: "Animals do not defy physics".

Comment #37 - Posted by: Coach at January 5, 2006 5:49 AM

215 x 1

3rounds for time, 20 reps each:
L-sit chins
45lb push-press
double-unders
10:36

Comment #38 - Posted by: Jerry Hill at January 5, 2006 6:01 AM

Maybe the fact that we're all carbon-based life forms has something to do with the universal similarities in many areas?
Will do this WoD tomorrow...
Did a semi-rest workout: run/walk for 1 mile, 25 GHD situps on the bleachers

Comment #39 - Posted by: tirzah at January 5, 2006 6:01 AM

3-95
3-95
3-95
3-95
2-115
2-115
2-115
1-125
1-125
1-125

Comment #40 - Posted by: David at January 5, 2006 6:09 AM

Going climbing this morning so i'll do this tonight at CF Atl.(fingers crossed)
Santa's helper (Brown aka UPS) arrived today with my first kettlebell!!! 1 pood
been playing with it every time I look at it! can't get the smile off my face!

Comment #41 - Posted by: Dan G at January 5, 2006 6:23 AM

OK, goal today is for a new PR (>205)

Adam, the secret to my getting in the pictures is to surround myself with good people. besides, who would be looking at me in that pic?

Comment #42 - Posted by: tombrose at January 5, 2006 6:23 AM

Great loads posted Tom O! As much as I don't always enjoy taking it from the ground, I do seem more physically and mentally 'primed' when I do that, as opposed to taking it from a rack.

Has anyone noticed a correlation between their max push jerk and their max clean & jerk?

Thanks,

John

Comment #43 - Posted by: John Murphy at January 5, 2006 6:32 AM

CF DC looks great! Looks like a fun time was had by all in that vid.

Comment #44 - Posted by: Steve HB at January 5, 2006 6:35 AM

Ok, that settles it, going out to get some cheap 5 and 10 # plates after work today. I tried going from 45# to 95# and almost put a sunroof in my car...

Did these with a dowel and the 45# bar instead. Then worked on OHS.

But can the animals do algebra?

Comment #45 - Posted by: tedw at January 5, 2006 6:37 AM

I'll just add this to the growing list of skills I need to develop. I believe I could have done more weight this morning but I suspect that would have been a mistake. Coach B.'s videos are a huge help. However, when he says "Dip and Drive" I somehow think of Rip Torn ("Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive and....Dodge").

CFWUx3
3 sets at 95
3 sets at 115
3 sets at 135

Comment #46 - Posted by: Chris J at January 5, 2006 6:43 AM

Warmup, then:

3 x 135
2 x 155
1 x 185
1 x 195
1 x 205 (I think this is a PR, can't find the reference, though)
1 x 215 (miss)

Bwt = 156

Comment #47 - Posted by: davidjwood at January 5, 2006 6:47 AM

"WOW, you guys in the USA must have different libel and slander laws to australia! thats some good "feedback" re: pacific fibre ropes."

No, the US is quite litigious. However, it's only libel if it's false.

Comment #48 - Posted by: Mike at January 5, 2006 6:59 AM

Any idea on the interval between the push jerks today?

Comment #49 - Posted by: Mayor at January 5, 2006 7:03 AM

3*135
3*145
3*145
2*155
2*165
2*165
1*175
1*185
1*185

Comment #50 - Posted by: Hartman at January 5, 2006 7:21 AM

Mayor,

On an ME day such as this you take as much rest as you think necessary to do a max on the following set.
I personally take 1-2 minutes between.

Comment #51 - Posted by: Allen Y at January 5, 2006 7:25 AM

Thanks Allen. Was not sure if I should be concentrated on time or if I should be concentrating on the weight. Thanks.

Comment #52 - Posted by: mayor at January 5, 2006 7:32 AM

bll,
I'm new to crossfit and there's some descriptions of the push jerk above.

After watching the second video, to me it's like shooting a jump shot.

Hold the barbell in the shoulder press position, then dip/bend your knees and waist, and explode up with your legs and arms. Result is a jumping shoulder press with your feet leaving the ground.

Again I'm new so someone please correct me if I made a mistake.

Leon

Comment #53 - Posted by: Leon at January 5, 2006 7:34 AM

95-115-115-125-135-135-145-145-145

Comment #54 - Posted by: CodyC at January 5, 2006 7:46 AM

185-190-205-185(Mental Regroup)-205-205-210-215(Failure)-205

Comment #55 - Posted by: Anand B at January 5, 2006 8:00 AM

95-115-135-145-155-165-175-165-165
BWT: 158

175 was fairly easy and I felt like I had quite a bit more in me, but I have not been putting the bar overhead as of late and was a bit uncomfortable going heavier. I'll get 200 next time.

Comment #56 - Posted by: Jon_e at January 5, 2006 8:08 AM

3-105
3-125
3-145
2-155
2-155
2-155
1-160
1-165
1-165
I worked hard on form in the first three sets, I think that allowed me to get to 165, when I first tried this exercise about a month ago, I couldnt even get 110 up!

My 11 year old Daughter Bailey will be doing this WOD this afternoon, I will post her results later, She'll probably whoop me! LOL!

Comment #57 - Posted by: Joey Mc at January 5, 2006 8:08 AM

I have a tendency to read, a lot, in any field that happens to attract my attention. I also, fortunately, work in a college library, and so, have access to almost anything I want to read.

Anyway, I have been reading in Complexity Theory lately, and today's article struck a chord with something I read recently.

In his book, "Complexity," Roger Lewin discusses the concept of "a morphogenetic attractor", with Brian Goodwin, a British biologist and Complexity theorist. Very simply, a morphogenetic attractor is a form or pattern that has a high probability of expression in a given environment.

One example of a morphogenetic attractor given in Lewin's book is the eye. Paraphrasing Lewin, as functional visual systems, eyes have evolved independently over forty times(Lewin, p 40).

This is something I did not know, but goes right along with the idea expressed in today's article. Namely, material reality is governed by underlying laws and the expression of those laws leads to certain recurring forms or patterns. Rather Platonic I think. Complexity theory is a fascinating topic.

That insight about the fish being affected by gravity by having to displace water was awesome thinking.

This is a simply great site, thanks Coach, Lauren, et al.

Looking forward to the WOD at lunch.

Comment #58 - Posted by: Patrick Kennedy at January 5, 2006 8:20 AM

Push Jerk 3-3-3-2-2-2-1-1-1 reps
All loads in kg

55*3-55*3-65*3-65*2-75*2-65*2-55-55-55

Looks like I got this one backwards. I realised at 75 that I was really push-pressing rather than push-jerking. Hence the back-off and focus on movement. Also, was getting up towards my max clean (80) and wasn't feeling it today.

Cheers, kempie

Comment #59 - Posted by: kempie at January 5, 2006 8:29 AM

cfwux2
w/tabata double unders=88

push jerk
3's 95-115-115
2's 120-120-125
1's 135-140-145

Comment #60 - Posted by: dennyy at January 5, 2006 8:31 AM

Coach Glassman,

I am glad to see you don't take shit from people who don't show any character in public forums, I applaud the fact that you did call him out for an explanation, I also noticed no response or apology.
BUT, don't let it eat at you man! Of course its hard to convey true emotion on the freakin internet but you sounded pretty riled-up! Face it, there are always a few turds in the bunch, but the community realizes that your contribution has been and is phenominal to our health and fitness as athletes. If someone thinks they can do a better job, let em go for it, wish em luck and forget them! It's not worth your valuable time and effort to screw with them. I have a feeling that if you did revoke his cert. he would still be promoting crossfit as his own anyway.

Josh, I don't know you and I give anyone the benefit of the doubt as long as you justify or apologize for your remarks. We all get mouthy sometimes, but give respect where it is due, It's hard to argue with Greg's program and the success I have seen from it, I am sure 99.9% of Crossfitters feel the same.

Just my $.02

Hope it works out, If not, maybe some MMA time in the ring would help, those guys always hug after someone gets their ass kicked!

Comment #61 - Posted by: Joey Mc at January 5, 2006 8:33 AM

3@95-105-115
2@125-135-145
1@155-165-175
Bringing the weight back down to my shoulders felt awkward(bad). I need some rubber plates.

Comment #62 - Posted by: Nick K at January 5, 2006 8:36 AM

3@65,75,80
2@90,100,105
1@110(f),110(f),practiced the jump, 110! pr by 10#
Felt real heavy today. ugh

Comment #63 - Posted by: Sue A. at January 5, 2006 9:05 AM

3@ 65,75,80
2@ 90,100,105
1@ 110
1@ 115 fail X 3

Good Job Sue!

Comment #64 - Posted by: Katie Jo at January 5, 2006 9:12 AM

Katie Jo you are my IDOL! Great Job as always

Comment #65 - Posted by: Sue A. at January 5, 2006 9:21 AM

I think that Mike Mueller has been eating the peyote again. . .


or he has an interesting love of heights and goats.


Joey Mc,

Don't worry too much about Coach, he hasn't been named the 'Osama of Fitness' because he is thin skinned. He is just a Dick. ;)

Comment #66 - Posted by: J Jones at January 5, 2006 9:27 AM

We did this one in class this morning.
3@ 73,93,103
2@ 113, 123, 133
1@ 153, 163, 173 (PR)

Comment #67 - Posted by: nicole at January 5, 2006 9:32 AM

As Rx'd:

135-145-155-165-175-185-195-205-215 both of us peaked here)

So get this... I (Justin) was trying for 225 lbs. but couldn't quite get under it, had to drop it...well apparently, the falling weights were too loud, and we got our 2nd warning to stop with our workouts. Unreal...Russ about threw down with the owner.

I wish we werent poor 23 year olds out of college, then we could get our own lil private gym without rules about chalk and weights clanging.

brutal eh!?

- Justin

Comment #68 - Posted by: J and Russ at January 5, 2006 9:33 AM

75,95,95
105,105,115
115,115,115
For this exercise and the OHS I really wish I had some bumper weights.

Comment #69 - Posted by: Travis_r at January 5, 2006 9:36 AM

95x3x3
105x2x3
115x1x2
115x3x1

It was important for me to have correct form, to explode under the bar and get into a good, deep squat the way Coach B showed us at the seminar. It's hard for me still, although I have been doing the skill transfer exercises daily. So I sacrificed some weight to get it right. I believe that in the end, I'll be able to throw much more weight up. In theory, anyway. Keep at it, something has to give.

Comment #70 - Posted by: Mike Joyce at January 5, 2006 9:47 AM

Hi all,
Workout as follows
Walk 5.1136 miles 87 minutes (medium pace)
Hand stand holds (against wall) :52, 1:00, :58, 1:00, :58.
Rope jump 2100 jumps 14:25
Until tomorrow...

Comment #71 - Posted by: Jonathan Jensen at January 5, 2006 9:52 AM

bwt.195
135-3-3
155-3
185-2-2
205-2
215-1
225-1-1

Comment #72 - Posted by: brent c at January 5, 2006 9:57 AM

Justin,

Ask them if they would rather you try to catch a bad push jerk and hurt yourself so that they will have to clear the way for the EMT's. I grabbed some flack a few weeks ago doing some snatches...I'd rather bail out and make some noise then try to hang onto a bad one and hurt myself in a incapacitating manner.

Comment #73 - Posted by: Allen Y at January 5, 2006 10:05 AM

If the gym you are at does not support olympic lifting, you should honor that. It is their business.

A gym nearby me considered it, but decided not to due to liability and space. I would expect them to shut it down, especially if it was being done without the proper setup.

Now if they have the facility, but don't like the noise, then somthing is not adding up.

Comment #74 - Posted by: Paul at January 5, 2006 10:16 AM

Paul,

i completely agree with your statement...i don't want to write a novel on the message board, but in short, they aren't treating the situation well as owners. It's one thing to say, "we'd rather u not perform these lifts because we don't have the right equipment", instead of "this is my gym and I don't like it...I win."

It's unfortunate I guess, I thought it was called an "Athletic Club" for a reason.

anyways, sorry to bog down the Msg Board with stuff like this...but Russ and I appareciate the moral support of the CrossFit community! I wish we lived closer to Toronto so we could use their facility.

Comment #75 - Posted by: J and Russ at January 5, 2006 10:21 AM

Got up with a badly inflamed left knee this morning, so decided no dynamic overhead lifts.
Instead I did seating push presses on machine. 77x3, 77x3, 82x3, 88x2, 93x2, 99x2, 104x1, 110miss, 104x1

Comment #76 - Posted by: JD Stephenson at January 5, 2006 10:28 AM

Regarding the rigging of the climbing ropes in the picture from Pacific Fibre: As noted, the problem isn't necessarily the rope itself, but the way it is rigged. First, the "carabiner" looks like one you would find in the hardware store that has a discalimer about supporting weight. They should have used either a locking carabiner (or 2 non-locking ones facing opposite directions) designed for climbing. Second, the splices should be longer. The strength of the splice depends on the friction force between the rope strands being pulled in different directions. This is dependent on, among other things, contact area. The number of times each "tail" should be "woven" thru depends on fiber type and rope diameter and numner of strands "twisted" or braided" together to form the rope. Third, on my climbing ropes, I typically include an "eye" where the rope loops around the carabiner (or whatever is used to attach the rope to the ceiling, etc.) to avoid any sharp bends. Finally, don't neglect the hardware or methods used to attach the carabiner (or whatever) to the mounting structure and don't forget to INSPECT the rope, hardware and mounting surface REGULARLY.

Comment #77 - Posted by: Mike Moore at January 5, 2006 10:33 AM

I know there have been push/jerk dumbbell exercises before with one dumbbell. I have dumbbells up to more than i can probably push/jerk anyway, anyone have any info on how to do these with one and two dumbbells?

Comment #78 - Posted by: cd at January 5, 2006 10:41 AM

65/75/85x3
95/100/105x2
110/115/120/125x1

Despite still fighting the flu bug, all the reps were quick and sure.

Comment #79 - Posted by: kelly moore at January 5, 2006 10:47 AM

Back still a little tight, but nothing like a WOD to fix things nice.

95/115/125x3
135/145/160x2
165/170/175x1

Held a handstand unassited for 10 seconds!

Comment #80 - Posted by: Karl from Champaign, IL at January 5, 2006 10:56 AM

3 - 75,85,95
2 - 105,115,125
1 - 135,145,155

Warmed up with some bag work and intermixed pullups and bar MU attempts between setss.

Comment #81 - Posted by: Scott Kustes at January 5, 2006 10:58 AM

CFWUx2
Hatch Squat Program

somehow, I read "PushPress" last night instead of "PushJerk".

PushPress:
115-125-135, 145-145-145, 155-165-155


Coach - Thank-you for the articles.

Comment #82 - Posted by: John Messano at January 5, 2006 11:00 AM

3- 95, 105, 115
2-135, 145, 155
1- 165, 175 (fail), 175 (success!)

Comment #83 - Posted by: TJM at January 5, 2006 11:09 AM

3-75
3-85
3-95
2-115
2-135
2-135
1-155
1-165
1-165

Comment #84 - Posted by: Brian E. at January 5, 2006 11:09 AM

24 kg kb
3-3-3-2-2-2-1-1-1

Comment #85 - Posted by: John Daniel at January 5, 2006 11:12 AM

135x3
145x3
155x3
165x2
155x2
165x2
165x1
165x1
175x1

Ray

Comment #86 - Posted by: Ray V. at January 5, 2006 11:12 AM

5k row: 17:41.5 Pr by a bit

As many rds as possible in 10 minutes:
5 HSPU
10 Mountain Climbers
15 24" Stair Jumps

Completed 4 rds plus 5 hspu and 10 MC's.

Comment #87 - Posted by: bradw at January 5, 2006 11:24 AM

Does anyone have any suggestion on other exercises to help with jerk movement and overhead squat. Keeping the weight up and back while maintaining form is almost impossible. Thanks for the help.Teams

Comment #88 - Posted by: jeff s at January 5, 2006 11:25 AM

3x3 @ 95 lbs
2X3 @ 135 lbs
1x3 @ 155 lbs

Comment #89 - Posted by: paulw at January 5, 2006 11:26 AM

In kilos:

20x3
40x3
50x3
60x2
62.5x2
65x2
67.5x1
70x1

Wasn't getting enough POP! out of my drive, so I called it a day instead of spending more practice doing them half-assed. Hadn't done heavy push jerks in a long while, usually I do split jerks.

Comment #90 - Posted by: Lincoln at January 5, 2006 11:27 AM

65 x 3
75 x 3
95x 3
105 x 2
115 x 2
125 x 2
135 x 1
155 x 1
165 x 1 (fail)

Should have started heavier.

Comment #91 - Posted by: B Ring at January 5, 2006 11:33 AM

95/115/135 x3
155/175/190(PR) x2
all good form up to this point

195 missed, dumped it, cleaned it back to rack
195 wobbly with a bit of a pressout getting under
200 miss, didn't get under quick enough
200 again wobbly, bit of a press getting under

Comment #92 - Posted by: Patrick Kennedy at January 5, 2006 11:45 AM

3@115
3@135
3@145
2@150
2@155
2@155
1@160
1@160
1@160

BW-175#

Comment #93 - Posted by: Todd K at January 5, 2006 11:50 AM

135x3
155x3
175x3
(185x2)x3
195x1
200xFail
200x1
205x1
Bodyweight 167lbs.

Form was getting a little questionable at the end, but good enough that it was still a push jerk. That's definitely the 1RM right now, at least without bumpers.

Comment #94 - Posted by: Matt G. at January 5, 2006 11:56 AM

Team Ruthless CF Va

135x3
175x2
185x2
195x1
205x1
215x1
220x1
225-failed the clean(x3) so I couldn't attempt the jerk

Comment #95 - Posted by: JeffT at January 5, 2006 12:05 PM

85
95
105
115
125
135
145
155
165
175(F)

BW 198

pretty weak but gettin better

Comment #96 - Posted by: pj at January 5, 2006 12:08 PM

CFWU:
20 minutes of 5 pull-ups, 10 push ups, 10 1.5 pood KB swings, 10 sit-ups

WOD as Rx'ed, all PJ's cleaned from the floor
3 x 95 lbs
3 x 115 lbs
3 x 125 lbs
2 x 135 lbs
2 x 145 lbs
2 x 155 lbs
1 x 165 lbs
1 x 175 lbs
1 x 195 lbs

Comment #97 - Posted by: GM at January 5, 2006 12:14 PM

30kg, 30, 35 x 3
35kg, 35, 40 x 2
40kg, 50, 50 x 1

Taking things nice and easy on my bad shoulders still, Push Jerk seems like a dislocation waiting to happen.

Comment #98 - Posted by: Orrin at January 5, 2006 12:26 PM

did split jerk, all cleaned from floor
bwt - 162.3
133,143,153 x 3
158,160.5,163 x 3
165.5,168(f-no lockout),168(f-bad clean)

Comment #99 - Posted by: opt at January 5, 2006 12:27 PM

3x (3x 95#)
2x 105#
2x 115#
2x 125#
1x 135#
1x 145#
1x 150#

Much harder for me to keep balanced dropping into the squat in this movement compared to the split jerk or jerking from behind the neck...

Comment #100 - Posted by: jdg at January 5, 2006 12:28 PM

95x3
115x3
125x3
135x2
145x2
155x2
165
175
185

Comment #101 - Posted by: Reed at January 5, 2006 12:45 PM

135,145,155
165,170,175
180,182.5,185

Comment #102 - Posted by: dobberz at January 5, 2006 12:45 PM

125-135 Lbs throughout. Felt like I could do more but the exercise is still moderately uncomfortable.

Comment #103 - Posted by: tenacious"D" at January 5, 2006 12:58 PM

cfwu x 3 rds +push-ups (pu's assisted)
95x3x2
115x3x2
125x3x2
135x2x2
145x2x2
155x2x1
165x1x1
170x1x1
175x1x1
kept weight light at first and did extra sets to work on form. quick question when driving the weight after the initial dip are the feet suppose to move outwards from the hop or stay relatively in the same place?

Comment #104 - Posted by: brian at January 5, 2006 12:58 PM

2nd day on Crossfit. Still sore from yesterday (did Tuesday's WOD). I probably should have started lighter, but didn't realize what I was getting into.

After Warm Up:

95 x 3
115 x 3
135 x 3
135 x 2
135 x 2
135 x 2
135 x 1
115 x 1
135 x 1

Comment #105 - Posted by: steve at January 5, 2006 1:05 PM

65x3
75x3
85x3
95x2
105x2
115x2
120x1
125x1
130x1
Koosta

Comment #106 - Posted by: Krista Colson at January 5, 2006 1:18 PM

55kg x 3
60kg x 3
65kg x 3
70kg x 2
72.5kg x 2
72.5kg x 2
75kg x 1
77.5kg x 1
80kg - fail
80kg x 1

Comment #107 - Posted by: DavidE at January 5, 2006 1:27 PM

Hello x-fitters. Could Coach or anyother person comment on the use of hindu squats. It seems to me that the hindu squats may offer some advantages over the tabata squats (as well as disadvantages). I know from experience that one can not move as fast doing the hindu squats vs normal bodyweight squats, but I definitely think that going all the way down to your heals expends alot more energy when comparing reps vs reps. I also like the fact that in hindu squats there is very little upper torso flexion when squating. This may really help xfitters when doing a workout after a brutal DL session or any other excerise that taxes the posterior chain through flexion. Just wondering what your thoughts may be. Thanks to all.

Comment #108 - Posted by: AJonusas at January 5, 2006 1:37 PM

AJonusas...it would probably be a good idea if you'd post this type of question back in the message board, which is more suited to a back-and-forth type of dialog.

Comment #109 - Posted by: Matt G. at January 5, 2006 1:51 PM

Steve wrote: "I probably should have started lighter, but didn't realize what I was getting into."

That sounds like something I've thought before.

Comment #110 - Posted by: Chris J at January 5, 2006 1:54 PM

Ah...the Push Jerk.
Finished with 315 and missed 335...not by much, though. Lots of sets of triples in the 265 to 285 range.

Bodyweight? Same as Eva.

Comment #111 - Posted by: Danny John at January 5, 2006 1:56 PM

235lbs for final single sets. Need a bit of work on form to go lower in the legs to get more under the bar. Finished strong.

Comment #112 - Posted by: Franz at January 5, 2006 1:57 PM

AJonusas

here is what Coach said about hindu squats back on Thursday, May 26, 2005

"We get regular email asking about Hindu squats. On the plus side they are easy to learn; people who can’t squat, Hindu squat. On the whole, however, the Hindu squat represents a weak/inferior motor recruitment pattern with these faults among others:

1. Blunts development of posterior chain – when the heels lift, glutes and hams fade
2. Unnecessarily shifts center of balance
3. Reduces stability as center of mass is lowered
4. Creates a potentially damaging shear force on the knee
5. Dead-end movement - not a progression for any other movement
6. Incapable of moving large loads
7. Retards learning to squat, deadlift, push-press, clean, jerk, snatch…"

There is lots more information on the "Search CrossFit" function button of the main page (column on the right).

Comment #113 - Posted by: J Jones at January 5, 2006 1:59 PM

AJonusas,
I agree with Matt G. Further, if you search the archives there you will find more discussion than you can read in one sitting on Hindu Squats.

Comment #114 - Posted by: Chris J at January 5, 2006 2:00 PM

Anthony
45x10
45x3
95x3
135x3
155x2
170x2
190x2
205x1
215x1 (10lbs PR)
225x1 (20lbs PR)
235x1 (30lbs PR)
BW: 180

Jodi
10x3
25x3
35x3
45x2
55x2
65x2
70x1
80x1 (10lbs PR?)
95x0 (SO CLOSE!!)
BW: 110

Comment #115 - Posted by: Anthony B at January 5, 2006 2:18 PM

Ulna problem restricted the weight I could tolerate, but I managed to modify the starting point so my arm was never totally bent. Did;
95x3 first 3 sets
105x2
115x2
115x2
125x1
135x1
145x1

Comment #116 - Posted by: paul woodruff at January 5, 2006 2:46 PM

Push Jerk

205 for 3
225 for 2
230 for 2
235 for 2
240, 245, 250, 255, 260, all for singles.

All weights cleaned from ground. At this point my Push Jerk is kinda limited by what I can clean.

Steveo

Comment #117 - Posted by: steven stackpole at January 5, 2006 2:54 PM

1pd turkish get-ups, 5 minutes
3 x 10 OHS

3x3+3 1pd 1arm
3x2+2 1.5pd 1arm
3x1+1 1.5pd + 15lb bag of rice 1arm

Finished with:
3 x 1,2,3,4 HSPU ladder
2 min. static handstands

Comment #118 - Posted by: brendan melville at January 5, 2006 3:00 PM

Damn Steven, that is some impressive weight! What's your BW??

Comment #119 - Posted by: Anthony B at January 5, 2006 3:00 PM

Lower back is still giving me trouble so I had to do something back friendly. Will try this WOD as soon as back relents.

- 5 x :01::20 to :01 Handstands
- Climbing board pull-ups:
17,13,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10

Seemed to take some of the tension out of my back.

Regarding Pacific Fiber ropes, from what I read above and saw with the link the problem is with the rigging. Does anyone have any good or bad comments on their manila ropes? I'm interested because I've already ordered a 1 1/2" manila rope and I'm considering canceling the order. I ordered the rope slick and planned to do the rigging myself. Any feedback greatly appreciated.

Comment #120 - Posted by: David at January 5, 2006 3:16 PM

started at 65 added 10 lbs/ set till got a single at 125 lbs. Could have gone more but first time doing these and form was breaking down a bit. BW 155 ht 5'10" Hindu squats- think they have a place but in my case doing high reps (300)did start causing knee pain

Comment #121 - Posted by: Tbird at January 5, 2006 3:21 PM

65x3,75x3,95x3,105x2,115x2,125x2,135x1,145x1,145x1

Comment #122 - Posted by: David B. at January 5, 2006 3:37 PM

Short on time today so I did CF warmupx3 followed by L sits and some Oly lift practice with a stick.

Comment #123 - Posted by: Norma at January 5, 2006 4:03 PM

Wow, do I find these hard. Sort of disappointed in my performance. However, I did three straight bar muscle ups today, so I don't feel so bad.

3x95
3x115
3x135
2x145 f
2x145 f
1x135
1x140
1x145 (let out a yelp after finally hitting this one)

Tariq

Comment #124 - Posted by: TK at January 5, 2006 4:05 PM

Second WOD of the day

Lucky 13:
13 rounds for time

10 ring push ups
10 20 lb Wall Ball Shots
10 20 lb Slam Ball
20 meter lunge with 20lb D-Ball in OHS position

35:37 with nothing lucky about it.

Comment #125 - Posted by: GM at January 5, 2006 4:09 PM

3 x 115 ( x 3 sets )
2 x 125
2 x 130
2 x 145
1 x 150
1 x 160
1 x 170
BW = 162

Comment #126 - Posted by: Mel Jenkins at January 5, 2006 4:11 PM

135 x 3; 145 x 3; 155 x 3; 165 x 2; 170 x 2; 175 x 2; 180 x 1; 185 x 1; 205 x 1.

Comment #127 - Posted by: reebs at January 5, 2006 4:19 PM

40kg-50kg-55kg-57.5kg-60kg-60kg-65-70-70
could have done more but cleaning the vveight vvas the limiting factor-my max clean is only 80kg at this stage.

Comment #128 - Posted by: Ers. at January 5, 2006 4:22 PM

1st time with this exercise.
Last few were probably more push-press than push-jerk.
95-95-95-115-115-115-135-135-135

Comment #129 - Posted by: Mark S at January 5, 2006 4:22 PM

135x3, 135x3, 145x3, 155x2, 165x2, 165x2 fail on second, 165x1, 170x1 fail, 170x1 fail.
Did sets at 135 and 45, 65&85 to try to get used to dropping into a squat.

Comment #130 - Posted by: Jim at January 5, 2006 4:41 PM

Warmup, then:

155x3, 155x3, 155x3, 175x2, 165x2, 165x2, 175x1, 175-fail, 175x1, 175x1

I think this is the first time I've ever actually tried an Olympic style lift. Kind of fun. :)

Comment #131 - Posted by: Kendall Frederick at January 5, 2006 4:42 PM

still trying to figure out how much weight I need to be using.

95x3
115x3
135x3
145x2
155x2
165x2
175x1
185x1
195x1

That is my PR and probably could have done a little more, but still not too sure of myself on these lifts. I tried to do the little hop thing during the jerk phase but did not always get off the ground.

Comment #132 - Posted by: Scotty at January 5, 2006 4:49 PM

All weights in lbs:

3 x 95, 3 x 105, 3 x 115, 2 x 125, 2 x 135, 2 x 145, 1 x 155, 1 x 165, 1 x 175 (failed), 1 x 170 (failed, close but couldn't lock it out) 1 x 165 (got it but just barely)

Toward my form was slipping and what I was doing was a lot closer to a push press so I finished off with some light push jerks to work on form.

Comment #133 - Posted by: DaNewf at January 5, 2006 4:53 PM

First time with push-jerks. DOMS in my legs and my unstable left shoulder were the biggest setbacks:

Bodyweight-175
3x95
2x115
2x135
1x155
1x165
1x185 (not clean, muscled it up to lockout)
1x185 (clean)
190-failed to lock-out

I feel unable to fully commit to these with the feeling that my left shoulder could sublux any time...

Comment #134 - Posted by: Jesse Woody at January 5, 2006 4:54 PM

cfwu x3

WOD: accidentally did:
Push Press: 3-2-2-2-1-1-1-1-1
3:135
2:155/155/155
1:165/175/185/185/185...slight slight jerk in a few of these. wish i wouldve just remembered it correctly. did BS form work afterwards (5x5 @135)...it seems to be coming along.

Comment #135 - Posted by: ediddy at January 5, 2006 4:57 PM

Kept the weights light/focused on form
65x3/95x3/105x3/115x2/125x2/125x2/135/135/135

Comment #136 - Posted by: Sam P at January 5, 2006 4:58 PM

As RXed.

BW: 165#

3 x 95#-115#-135#
2 x 155#-165#-165#
1 x 175#F-175#-180#F-175#Fx2-155#F-155#-155#

Wow. Just didn't seem to have it today. Wasn't getting deep enough on the second dip towards the end. Think i was starting to lose my nerve with the bigger weights.

On the upside, my last PR was 150#, so at least there is something to be a bit happy about. Mind you, the time that PR was set on 2005-11-24 during the clean / push-press / push-jerk / split-jerk WoD, so i may have been able to get more than 150# if i had just worked for a PJ max.

Comment #137 - Posted by: john v. at January 5, 2006 5:12 PM

Bodyweight 140
75 x3
85 x2
95 x2
105 x2
115 x1
125 x1
135 x1
145 x1 (PR!)
145 x1

Cleaned the weight from the ground. Felt strong and technique came together today. Love it when that happens.

Comment #138 - Posted by: David Knutzen at January 5, 2006 5:16 PM

As RX'ed no rest between sets @95lb.

Comment #139 - Posted by: Jack Lanning at January 5, 2006 5:26 PM

135 x 3
145 x 3
155 x 3
165 x 2
175 x 2
175 x 2
185, 185, 190 fail x 2, 185

Comment #140 - Posted by: Paul Si at January 5, 2006 5:26 PM

Thank you, still new to posting on this site.

Comment #141 - Posted by: AJonusas at January 5, 2006 5:28 PM

Finished at 210, on the "I'm surfing later today" tapered version. (Didn't surf either, DOH!)

Comment #142 - Posted by: Wounded Buffalo at January 5, 2006 5:30 PM

3x95
3x115
3x125
2x130
2x135
2x140
1x145
1x150
155 (failx2)
1x135
I think that's a PR of about 5 pounds for putting weight over my head. I'm inching towards bodyweight (165).

Comment #143 - Posted by: Sam L at January 5, 2006 5:35 PM

95# X 3
115 X 3
133 X 3
143 X 2
153 X 2
163 X 2
173 X 1
193 X 1 PR but kinda ugly
193 Dropped

Javier worked on form with Bar

Comment #144 - Posted by: Chrispy at January 5, 2006 5:37 PM

120x3
120x3
120x3
130x2
130x2
130x2
135x1
125x1
125...fail

I noticed that as I went up in the weight I was fine with getting the weight from the floor to my chest but as I went to push it up I would bend my knees and would go up but my feet went out to the sides...I got the weight up but felt the form was off so I dropped the weight back down...does it matter where my feet finish?

Thanks

Chris

Comment #145 - Posted by: Chris Brophy at January 5, 2006 5:38 PM

135-155-175 for the 3/2/1

Mentally blocked on the push-jerk 'cause I've been doing lots of C/J, so I kept wanting to split jerk. Plus, without the wider snatch grip my back doesn't free up. Am I doing something wrong?
Shouldn't be complaining - I didn't hurt myself.
DS

Comment #146 - Posted by: davidstryker at January 5, 2006 5:45 PM

BW 165
Warmup
95x3
115x3
135x3
155x2
165x2(PR)
165x2
175x1(New PR)
175x1
185x1(Newest PR)
Hardest part was bringing 165 back down to chest on multiples. Studied the videos - made all the difference in the world!

Comment #147 - Posted by: MikeT at January 5, 2006 5:50 PM

Sun Salute x3
CFWU x 3

Bar(45lbs) x 5
65x3
85x3
95x3
115 x 3 (2 push jerks the first was something else)
125x2
125x2
135x1
135x1
135x1
Barx10

Misc weight lifting.

Thighs screaming from the T-squats I did yesterday.

My son Jamie did
10 x 10 pushups
2 x 25 situps
2 x 10 cnt chin holds.

J

Comment #148 - Posted by: Jeff_Roddy at January 5, 2006 5:54 PM

Shoulder didn't like the pj's so
Warmup: 10# clubs, double mills: 10/10
10 min snatch test, 26# kb
105L/105R Worked in 10s through 80 reps each side, then droped to 5s for the remainder. No breaks, no setting the kb down.

Comment #149 - Posted by: Lynne Pitts at January 5, 2006 5:58 PM

from the rack:
3@ 95 -3@ 100 -3@ 100
2@ 105 -2@ 115 -2@ 115
1@ 120 -1@ 125 -1@ 125

Took 8 weeks off to train for the marathon; can see the loss of strength.

Comment #150 - Posted by: Dannyboy at January 5, 2006 5:59 PM

Lynne, that workout is astounding!

Comment #151 - Posted by: davidstryker at January 5, 2006 6:02 PM

135x3
155x3
165x2
165x2
165x2
175x1
175x1
185x1
190x1
195x1 failed

feeling like a wimp

Comment #152 - Posted by: Paresh at January 5, 2006 6:04 PM

Max lift Clean and Jerk 185(PR)

Comment #153 - Posted by: Nick C at January 5, 2006 6:04 PM

Don't know who Joey Mc is, but it's nice to have him around.

Jonesy: good answer Mr. Hammer.

I'm no Steve Stackpole, but here goes:
Started at 95.
Got to 155, felt good.
Finished with doubles at 140.

Then front squats, 5 min cario, home.

Comment #154 - Posted by: Ron Nelson at January 5, 2006 6:09 PM

J: 45x3x3 + 55x2x3 + 65x1x3
P: 95x3x3 + 115x2x3 + 135x1x3

Comment #155 - Posted by: Paul at January 5, 2006 6:10 PM

110lbs x 3
110lbs x 3
110lbs x 3
120lbs x 2
120lbs x 2
120lbs x 2
130lbs x 1
140lbs x 1
150lbs x 1

Comment #156 - Posted by: Matt B at January 5, 2006 6:16 PM

DB C&P 75'sx5,4,3
Clean & Push Press
155x3
185x3
205x1
210x1
215x1
Jerk
185x3,3,3,3

Comment #157 - Posted by: craigv bwt 185 at January 5, 2006 6:57 PM

1/3 CFWU
115/125/125, 130/135/135, 145/145/165
2/3 CFWU
I know the theory is lighter wt w/ perfect form, but I've noticed that w/ the jerks (split, push) I seem to get better form and in a better groove with more weight. I think the weight forces you to drop under the bar, whereas when you can just push it up, there's a tendency to press and then squat, rather than dropping explosively under it in one smooth motion.

Lynne et al., regarding the article. I'm inclined to give the scientist a little slack. What we're reading is an article by a writer describing some fairly in-depth research, not the actual research. Second, even if the article is dead-on, there's a big difference between scientific proof and an intuitive conclusion or observation. We all might say, "why yes, it makes perfect sense that organisms would develop locamotive abilities in response to certain "laws" or principles of physics related to mass, etc., regardless of the medium." It's a far, far different thing to reduce that principle to a mathematical proof. Third, truly genius for Bejan to "discover" the solution to his problem with fish. The incompressibility of water (from fluid mechanics or physics 101).

Comment #158 - Posted by: Dale Saran at January 5, 2006 7:05 PM

Push Jerk:

72 x 3
82 x 3
92 x 3
102 x 2
112 x 2
122 x 2
132 x 1
142 x 1 (pressed the weight up)
142 x 1 (pr)

Comment #159 - Posted by: Alfie at January 5, 2006 7:07 PM

DB C&P 55'sx3
DB C&P 65'sx3
DB C&P 65'sx3
DB C&P 55'sx2,2,2
DB C&P 55'sx1,1,1
Still working on form..

Comment #160 - Posted by: doug at January 5, 2006 7:13 PM

Group Moffett completed:

21-15-9

One arm dumbell swings (men 45lb & women 20-30lb)
Pullups
Deadlift (men 135lb & women 90lb)
Hanging leg raises

Total time to complete WOD 18:22:79

Comment #161 - Posted by: Adrian D at January 5, 2006 7:16 PM

Nicole,

How much over bodyweight did you put overhead??? Outstanding! I need to get some instruction from you!

Comment #162 - Posted by: kelly moore at January 5, 2006 7:16 PM

Oops. Thought it said Split Jerk.

Split Jerks:
135x3
155x3
165x3
175x2
185x2
195x2
200x1
205x1
210x1 PR by 5

Comment #163 - Posted by: J. Holmes at January 5, 2006 7:36 PM

3x45
3x50
3x55
2x60
2x65
2x70
1x75
1x80 (PR)
1x85 (New PR)

Comment #164 - Posted by: Krista J. at January 5, 2006 7:37 PM

3x95
3x95
3x105
2x115
2x115
2x125
1x145
1x155
1x165
Go heavier next time; shoulder still hurts from Linda.

Comment #165 - Posted by: Larry E. at January 5, 2006 7:47 PM

All lifts from rack
45#x10, 65x3, 85x3, 90x3, 95x2, 95x2, 100x2, 105f, 105x1, 105x1, 105x1

Wider grip seemed easier

Comment #166 - Posted by: CO Jeff at January 5, 2006 7:53 PM

Thanks ED, I was able to view the video

Comment #167 - Posted by: Alex at January 5, 2006 8:16 PM

BTW=150.
135-3
150-2
150-2
155-2
165
175
185PR
190PR
190Fail
190Failed and nearly folded myself in half, the wrong way. Called it quits.

-D.

Comment #168 - Posted by: Dan Silver at January 5, 2006 8:16 PM

Didn't watch the video very closely prior. My form must of been horrible. It was killing my shoulders. Started light and stayed that way. Found that going behind the head was easier on my shoulders. Too bad I didn't find that out earlier.

Workout #1- 1000m swim(500css,500fin), 4 mile run
Workout #2- CFWU x3(sub'd ball push-ups for dips)
WOD 95-115-135-135-115-95-115-135-145

Went up and down like a yo-yo. Definatley need to work on form. Starting w/from behind the head.

Comment #169 - Posted by: DJ at January 5, 2006 8:17 PM

first crossfit workout. first time doing push jerk, need to work on form.
135x3
145x3
155x3
165x2
175x2
185x2
195x1
205x1
215x1(fail)couldn't lockout
155x10

can't wait for tomorrow

Comment #170 - Posted by: chris l at January 5, 2006 8:33 PM

Interesting lesson in technique. When getting good squat on the jerk heavier weights not too tough - finally getting a good feel of what the lift should be about. Unfortunately, had more frequent poor technique lifts.

95 x 3
115 x 3
125 x 3

145 x 3 (autopilot added an extra rep)
145 x 2
155 x 2 155 pretty close to max clean

160 Fail on jerk
160 Fail on jerk
160 Fail on clean

Back off - 145 x 3

Comment #171 - Posted by: Baron at January 5, 2006 8:35 PM

105x3
125x3
135x3
145x2
150x2
155x2
160x1
165x1 miss
165x1

Danny John can sure get that weight up!

Comment #172 - Posted by: John P at January 5, 2006 8:43 PM

3x45
3x55
3x65
2x70
2x75
2x80
1x85
1x90
1x95(PR)

Comment #173 - Posted by: Megan S. at January 5, 2006 8:52 PM

Cleaned from floor, progressed from power clean to squat clean as weight increased.
3 @ 90
3 @ 110
3 @ 135
2 @ 155
2 @ 165
2 @ 175
1 @ 185
1 @ 205
1 @ (attempted 215, but ran out of gas after the squat clean)

Wife
3x65#
3x75#
3x85#
2x95#
2x95#
2x95#
3x95#
<3mi run

Comment #174 - Posted by: Eric2 at January 5, 2006 9:21 PM

Painstorm 9 about 40:00. Can be done in under 35 with ease if you don't do sled drags, Rutman mile deadlifts and Jonesworthy before.

Afterwards:
21-15-9
One arm dumbell squat thrust snatch X 30#
Ring Push ups
Ring Pull ups
9:15

Comment #175 - Posted by: Jeff at January 5, 2006 9:52 PM

BW 185, all pwr cleaned from the ground each round (legs to fried from Tabata DOMS for full squat Cleans)

135
145
155

160
165
170 (they started to get ugly around this weight)

185 (PR)
195 (PR)
205 (Fail) PR for a Clean though!

Shouldn't have tried for the big jump at the end but I wasn't counting weight and I figured what the hell.

This is Jack Hammer signing off. . .

Comment #176 - Posted by: J Jones at January 5, 2006 10:08 PM

Push Jerk
#
65# x 3
65# x 3
70# x 3
70# x 2
75# x 2
75# x 2
80# x 1
80# x 1
??? missed a rep

Comment #177 - Posted by: Laurar at January 5, 2006 11:06 PM

3: 35kg,40kg,45k
2: 50kg,50kg,50kg
1: 55kg,60kg,65kg

Comment #178 - Posted by: pete at January 6, 2006 12:35 AM

Using sandbag: 3x25kg, 3x30kg, 3x35kg, 2x40kg, 2x41.25kg, 2x42.5kg,3x1x45kg


Comment #179 - Posted by: Christian Lemburg at January 6, 2006 12:50 AM

team tikrit:
mfbunch: 3's: 95, 115, 125; 2's: 135 all; 1's: 155, 155, 165
joeyd: same
form work afterward (catch wasn't low enough but rather than think too much during the lift, went ahead and went for it then tried to do a little neural imprinting afterward)

as for the article: don't put the cart before the horse: "We found that all of the motors used by humans and animals for transportation have a common upper limit of mass-specific net force output that is independent of materials and mechanisms." this statement sums up the research, another way of saying this is that the potential for power output is directly proportional to the mass of the object. the research is specific to locomotion (the only thing new in the research is the explanation for how this law applied to locomotion in water).

unfortunately for the researchers, the author of this article seems to have provided his own commentary-from what i can see-and made the leap that this theory somehow explains all locomotion rather than showing a corrollary, and further goes on to say that this also supports the theory of evolution-the old theory that form indicates origin, which is a subject for another forum altogether.

that said, the bigger the animal, the more powerful it probably is, which can now be demonstrated in marine species too. hooah.

i may be way off the mark here, but at least i have my health.

Comment #180 - Posted by: mfbunch at January 6, 2006 1:34 AM

Well my first time doing Push Jerks. Here are the results in KG

50x3
55x3
57.5x3
60x2
62.5x2
65x2
67.5x1
70x1
72.5x1

These where done off the rack will try and do some cleans to push jerk next time.

PB = 72.5kg

London Crossfitter!

Comment #181 - Posted by: Lorenzo F at January 6, 2006 2:34 AM

First time doing this one. What is the difference with going behind the head versus in front of the head on the lift?

This definitely needs some work...

3 X 115
2 X 115
1 X 125

Comment #182 - Posted by: ZP at January 6, 2006 2:49 AM

In Kilos:

30 x 3
32.5 x 3
35 x 3
37.5 x 2
37.5 x 2
40 x 2
45 x 1
45 x 1 (fail)
45 x 1 (fail)

Comment #183 - Posted by: Christina Sklebar at January 6, 2006 3:25 AM

95x3x3
115x3x2x2
135x2
155x1x1x1

10 min bike warm up.

Comment #184 - Posted by: kevin o at January 6, 2006 4:17 AM

ZP...going behind the head severely limits the utility of this exercise as a precursor to/component of the Oly lifts. Unless you can clean and jerk behind your back...which if you can I'd absolutely love to see ;)

Comment #185 - Posted by: Matt G. at January 6, 2006 5:12 AM

Completed As Rx'd 1/6 am. All push jerks.
135x3
155x3
175x3
195x2
215x2
225x2(PR)
235F
235F
235F. Just couldn't get it. I could get under it and extend arms, just couldn't get it up. I think its a comfort thing(have PP and C&J'd more, but that might have been more of a PC/PP). Fun workout anyway.

Decided to try some one arm barbell snatches afterward, just for kicks. Started with the dumbell and worked up with a few sets of 3R 3L at 45, 55, 65. The did a few single with each arm at 85. Then tried to jump to 115. That wasn't happening so I called it a day.

Going back tonight for a 2nd WOD, as yet undecided.

Comment #186 - Posted by: Andy Shirley at January 6, 2006 6:27 AM

Six hours of downhill skiing yesterday, busted moguls all morning, then got some wicked mad speed up GS-ing on the groomers in the afternoon. Scared myself a couple of times but refused to crash. Will do today's wod tomorrow.

Comment #187 - Posted by: Mike Mueller at January 6, 2006 6:38 AM

as RX'd after a 12 hour push(gym too crowded yesterday)

bw:165
135x3
135x3
155x3
165x2
175x2
175x2
180, 185, 190 singles...

Comment #188 - Posted by: stokedaddy at January 6, 2006 7:24 AM

3x45
2x85
1x95
depth limited on jerk due to knee surgery, I am still rehabbing

Comment #189 - Posted by: Mark Madonna at January 6, 2006 8:05 AM

Last night, did running up and down stairs and 3 rounds of squats, push-ups, lunges, and abs.

Comment #190 - Posted by: Dmh6482 at January 6, 2006 8:08 AM

95x3
115x3
115x3
125x2
125x2
125x2
135x1
135x1
135x1

Jeremy

Comment #191 - Posted by: Jeremy at January 6, 2006 8:45 AM

3x: 135,140,145
2x: 150,155,160
1x: 165,170,155

Comment #192 - Posted by: broot at January 6, 2006 10:43 AM

3x: 55, 55, 60
2x: 65, 60, 60
1x: 65, 65, 65

Comment #193 - Posted by: GinaC at January 6, 2006 11:18 AM

3*115-125-135
2*145-155-165
1*170-175-185(fail*2)-180 (fail)
Losing weight out in front - needing to work on form a bit.

Comment #194 - Posted by: Patrick at January 6, 2006 11:22 AM


3 x 135, 155, 175
2 x 185, 195 (Failed twice in the same way: didn't lock out first rep and not close on second)
1 x 185 (shot right up)
1 x 195 (shot right up)
1 x 205 fail, short rest
2 x 175

I found that widened my grip and was not getting under the bar as I went heavier. Once I concentrated on those 2 things I overcame the 195 barrier.

Comment #195 - Posted by: Kramer at January 6, 2006 12:50 PM

3x90lb
2x100lb
2x110lb
2x120lb
1x135lb
1x145lb
1x155lb pr
1x165lb pr
1x170lb pr

Nice start to the New Year 20lb pr today and 3 and a half mins off Linda yesterday.

Comment #196 - Posted by: Markb at January 6, 2006 2:48 PM

3x125#
3x125#
3x125#
2x136#(failed the second, off balance)
2x136#
2x136#
1x136#
1x142#
1x142#

Comment #197 - Posted by: Rico at January 6, 2006 3:26 PM

95-135lbs worked some ring pull ups and L sits inbetween sets.

Comment #198 - Posted by: johnl at January 6, 2006 3:31 PM

3-135
3-145
3-155

Comment #199 - Posted by: trooper at January 6, 2006 4:40 PM

cfwu x 2
65 # x3
85# x3
95# x3
95 # x2
105# x2
95# x 2
105 # x 1
95# x1
95# x1working on form

Comment #200 - Posted by: mark at January 6, 2006 5:11 PM

3x135
2x175
2x175
2x175
1x200
1x215
1x225f
1x185
1x185

Comment #201 - Posted by: J Ross at January 6, 2006 5:56 PM

Started with empty bar. Worked up to 195 LBs. Failed twice at 205

Rode bike for 30 minutes while reading magazine (guilty pleasure)

195 LBs is new PR!

Comment #202 - Posted by: MikeY at January 6, 2006 8:03 PM

Limited for time so 1 x CFWU did band assisted pull-ups.
Gym doesn't have free standing racks(yet)so I had to use power rack, so no droping of weights:(
3-30kg/66lbs
3-32.5kg/71.5lbs
3-35kg/77lbs
2-40kg/88lbs
2-42.5kg/93.5lbs
2-42.5kg
1-45kg/99lbs (have to remember to use collars so i get the 100lbs)
1-45kg
1-47.5/104lbs failed
1-45kg

Comment #203 - Posted by: Fi at January 7, 2006 1:05 AM

Rower: 16:30min 300Cal
Stairmaster 15min ?Cal
Eliptical 15min ?Cal

Comment #204 - Posted by: Durham M. IAFF at January 7, 2006 7:49 AM

C/F W/U
95lbs w/u
145x3
165x3
170x3-2-2-2
175x1
180x1
185x1

Comment #205 - Posted by: Travis Braddock at January 7, 2006 11:32 AM

3x3: 135-lbs
3x2: 155-lbs
1x 165-lbs
1x 175-lbs
1x 185-lbs

BW: 160-lbs

Comment #206 - Posted by: Wade W at January 7, 2006 1:04 PM

3x115,3x95,3x95,2x115,2x115,2x115,1x135,1x135,1x135

Did this one after WOD 060106... elbows were cashed from cleans so I didn't go as heavy.

Comment #207 - Posted by: A.M. at January 7, 2006 1:22 PM

Clean and Jerk
3x95, 3x105, 3x115, 2x125, 2x135
Push Kerl
2x145, 1x155, 1x165, 1x175

Comment #208 - Posted by: AJonusas at January 7, 2006 6:11 PM

3's: 95-1150125
2's: 135-145-145
1's: 155-165-165(F - low back pain)-135

All reps started from the rack. I could've gone heavier but upper range over-head lifts give me low back pain (due to a combination of scoliosis and eating s#!t skating pools.)

Comment #209 - Posted by: B. White at January 7, 2006 6:50 PM

My apologies for the typo... the three rep sets should read 95-115-125.

Comment #210 - Posted by: B. White at January 7, 2006 6:52 PM

60 3 70/3 75/3 80/2 85/2 85/2 85/2 90 fail push then again also

bw 91

Comment #211 - Posted by: Tim 'crack' Hulbert at January 8, 2006 1:01 AM

3 x 95, 115, 135
3 x 2 x 145
3 x 1 x 155

Comment #212 - Posted by: PeterN at January 8, 2006 8:27 AM

3 x 95
3 x 105
3 x 115
2 x 125
2 x 130
2 x 135
1 x 140
1 x 145
1 x 145

Comment #213 - Posted by: EBourassa at January 8, 2006 11:29 AM

Meyer 3-155; 3-155; 3-155
3-165; 175-2; 185-failed; 2-185
195 failed 3x, finally got 195 on 4th try
200-1
205 failed 4x
Jeff 3-3x95 3-2x65 3-1x65

Comment #214 - Posted by: Meyer at January 8, 2006 6:45 PM

40kgx3
45kgx3
45kgx3
50kgx2
55kgx2
57.5kgx2
60kgx1
60kgx1
60kgx1

Comment #215 - Posted by: Andy at January 8, 2006 9:03 PM

Back after 3 weeks holiday break.
35-40 kg, working on form.

Comment #216 - Posted by: JefM at January 9, 2006 6:56 AM

Mod "fran"

55# DB swing
Clapping pull ups
21-15-9

6:21

Comment #217 - Posted by: Kyle Edwards at January 9, 2006 1:51 PM

Abraham Lincoln Crossfit

Tom (bw 205)

135, 145, 155, 160, 165, 170
185, 195, 200

Comment #218 - Posted by: Tom Londrigan at January 10, 2006 3:51 PM

135x3x3x3
145x2,150x2,155x2
165x1,170x1,175x1 bw190
feeling stronger because of Xfit. Could have done more I think...

Comment #219 - Posted by: Matt Kelley at January 11, 2006 12:51 PM

Finally getting around to this after a long sick.
Vincent is still sick

BW=225

3x155
3x205
3x225
2x235
2x245
2x255
1x255
1x255
1x255

Comment #220 - Posted by: Michael Ledney at January 14, 2006 8:01 AM
Post a comment






Remember personal info?